Sheriff Joe Arpaio Seeks Grand Jury on Obama Birth Certificate Fraud

Embed This


G & M
Subscribe to The Globe & Malevolence, your daily intelligence briefing via Noisy Room, Maggie's Notebook,
Gulag Bound,
and other key sources.
Oh yeah, it's free -- maybe as long as we are.

Comments

  1. Robert Callahan says:

    How is it that some of the most respected people in fields lose any and all credibility when they take on the cause of trying to find out who Barract Obams really is. Normal people do not pay millions of dollars to block access to school records, which now indicate Obama attended school as a FOREIGN student. Why is it surprising people want to know if he lied then or now. His actions reflect an allegience to Islam and Muslims even though he claims to be Christian. He cannot be both. His school records state he is Muslim. His name Barry Soetoro has no record of EVER being legally changed. His social security number is suspect, his draft registration has been proven to be a forgery. The first birth certificate he presented was a forgery. The list goes on and on. Responsible people do not behave like this. Presidents definitely, do not behave like this. The courts have never heard this case on it’s merit. Instead, the case is avoided, dodged and never heard for the weakest of reasons. One thing that cannot be denied is that this president has no respect for the rule of law, the constitution or even the American people. I suspect this president will go down in history as the worst president in history. Like the Trayvon Martin case public opinion is divided along racial lines, but the truth about Trayvon MartinIs he was a young thug, a bit too big for his age and he got what he deserved. Obama for at least now has been able to successfully avoid being held accountable for his actions. People question if he should be impeached. I say he should be tried for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors,jIled if not shot, for he has inflicted more injury on the country than any military adversary ever has.

    • Arlen Williams says:

      Thank you Robert.

      This seems the most plausible explanation, to me, especially considering that Obama’s mother worked for Timothy Geithner’s father at one of the biggest Overton Window, controlled opposition fronts aligned with the CIA for “third way” global collectivism (the Ford Foundation, another being the Rockefeller Foundation):

      http://gulagbound.com/29783/barack-obama-the-cia-and-the-communists

      Don’t trust those in power who behave deviously and surreptitiously. Don’t fall victim to imposed paradigms. Don’t except excuses.

  2. Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year, and, BTW, he showed it way back in June 2008, five months before the election), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.

    And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him.

    And Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the “Health Bureau Statistics” section, where Obama’s birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Obama_citizenship_denial

    • The COLB is just a subsequent document, not an official birth certificate. Obama’s family shows signs of involvement in intelligence. If they wanted it to appear for whatever reason that he was born on that date in that hospital, they could have easily planted that announcement in the paper at the time.

      • Obama showed both the COLB and the long form birth certificate. BOTH of them are official birth certificates. BOTH. The short form COLB—certification of live birth is just a fancy name for “birth certificate” is accepted by the US State Department for issuing US passports and the branches of thye US Military for enlistments.

        At the time that Obama was born, Obama’s grandfather was a FURNITURE SALESMAN, and his grandmother was at the time a low-level employee in a bank (she did not rise to become the first vice president in a Hawaii bank until 1970), and Obama’s mother was a sophomore or junior in COLLEGE and his father was also in college. So the “involvement in intelligence” notion is—er, NOT very intelligent.

        Pray tell what the motive would be for an intelligence agency to plant a birth notice in 1961 in any case?

        But, since you honestly seem to believe that there is a rational CHANCE that Obama was born in a foreign country, surely you can answer this question:

        For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

        (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

        (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

        (3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).

        So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

        (Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )

        • You assert validity where evidence exists of fraudulence. Then you concoct as intricate a straw man argument as feasible, it seems, in order to break it down. Thanks for showing what the Obots are saying, though.

        • Appaio has scientifically demonstrated that the birth certificate presented as official, the long form birth certificate, is a sophisticated forgery.

          But it does not matter to people like you. Actual facts don’t matter.

Speak Your Mind

*