In the comments to Mark Musser’s article on Martin Heidegger, the NAZI father of the green movement and its goal of authoritarian environmentalism, someone just posted a raised eyebrow at my term, Marxofascist, “Whatever ‘Marxofascist’ is supposed to mean.”
If one uses a term, he should be able to explain what it means. That word is used often around the Gulag, so here is my reply to the Marxist commentator, humbly offered.
Since I coined the term, I’ll explain briefly. Marxofascist is the engaging in Marxofascism and that term may be used synonymously with neo-Marxism meted out by means of crony capitalism and “public-private partnerships” as stepping stones, or Marxist power play gradualism (Gramsci-through-Alinsky), or Marxist manipulation for permanent majority rule of the proletariat (Trotsky), or communitarianism, or the looser definition of socialism.
It is collectivism by committee and ministerial council (a style of governance generally shared by Marxist and fascist societies). In short, it is what one sees from the central banking complex and their sponsored or cooperative institutions and personages (IMF, China, Russia, EU, George Soros, Maurice Strong, Barack Obama, Ban Ki-moon, most American Democrats by default, many American Republicans in half measures, etc.).
It is a family name for two bastard brother philosophies, the adherents often having regarded themselves as rivals, but often and especially now, cooperating on the upswing of insurrection and revolution.
Corporatism and state capitalism are synonymous. The redistributive complex of (un)”sustainable” Agenda 21 is a classic example. In practice, this is the principle opponent of, and the clear and present danger to individual/popular sovereignty and human liberty. There is one way to be free and there is only one direction to go, from freedom. In America, any practice or influence of Marxofascism, whether intentionally by its Marxofascist subversives and insurrectionists, or even unintentionally, through tragically misinformed versions of the coercive altruism of systems of “social justice,” is America’s major historic enemy to vanquish, whether from foreign or domestic sources.
Leaving aside the fictional notion of Gramsci’s political program and description of Trotsky’s views that is, at best, underdefined, one is left with the anti-“Economic Marxism” of Gransci leading, consciously, to the very “Economic Marxism” of Trotsky.
I suppose this type of nonsense is what we can expect in the age when junk thought parallels the production of junk food.
B.S.,
Thank you for your post. Surely you don’t expect someone who blows the cover of the quiet convergence of all kinds of humanist collectivists on the upswing of their subversive, structural revolution to get lost with you in the trees. No, this is all about seeing the forest and Serfdom Road being taken in it.
As for “junk thought,” there is no junk thought quite like Marxist and bastard brother fascist junk thought. So attest the failure of any of the proponents’ utopias or quasi-utopias to manifest and the bloody trail of over a hundred million innocent lives.
Arlen
“It is collectivism by committee and ministerial council (a style of governance generally shared by Marxist and fascist societies)”. My friend and founder of a now deceased blog coined the word “Farxist” to describe a fascist Marxist, or a Marxofascist. Thus, the blog lived and died as The Farxist Report, which often cited articles from Gulag Bound. Appreciate your blog, Arlen.
That is sweet to see, JoniT. Thank you, “Let God be true and every man a liar,” (and let us be true to Him). I hope our Farxist watching “comrade” is doing alright.