Anarcho-Syndicalist Adolf Hitler did not ‘Abolish Unions’ he Augmented them

I guess the time is overripe to do some writing about Naziism and its parallels to Obama’s “Organizing for” and nationalization of America.  Much of that has to do with union domination of both public and private concerns.

Here is an excellent little report from The Graph, which scratches the surface.  It explains how the current group-think blather of neo-Marxists, so often repeated in Madison, Wisconsin lately that, “Hitler abolished the unions,” is a classic, propagandist lie.

Actually, he took unionists’ utopianist, anarcho-syndicalist dreams and folded them into the ministerial control of fascism, like eggs into a batter.  What a coincidence for Barry O.

Hitler Didn’t Outlaw Unions – As a National Socialist, He Went Double-Down On Them

Posted on 21. Feb, 2011 by Brooks Bayne in Articles

Time and time again, the collectivist left in America chooses hyperbole when championing their economy-killing objectives. Most recently, as in the case of the socialist union (yes, they were created by socialists and Marxists)  protests in Wisconsin, you see many signs being wielded by the neo-Marxist rubes stating, “Hitler banned unions”. The purpose of this urban legend-styled disinformation, of course, is a weak attempt to paint Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker as a Nazi, even though the Nazi’s were national socialists who subscribed to most of the tenets of modern American leftists.

continues, please finish there

Also from that article, this kind of symbology deserves an article all its own.  This is an actual, Nazi banner from 1930’s Germany.



  1. Actually they were Fascists that suppressed unions. They also destroyed their Liberal, Socialist, and Communist opposition. Check “”The Third Reich in Power” by Richard J. Evans (2005).

    • Actually they were Fascists that suppressed independent unions, While co-opting them into a greater union umbrella. National Socialists are liberal, “progressive” in most respects, according to Adolf Hitler himself.

      Hitler said: “We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.”

      Check the rise and fall of the third Reich, instead of some co-opted hack piece put on by a dedicated pro-union Obama hack.

      • I appreciate your references, Toaster. What you describe is what we mean by “augmenting” and it is similar to what is being done with unions, today in America, especially public unions.

  2. Chemiczny Bogdan says:

    This is true only if “augmenting unions” means “systematically killing trade unionists”. Seriously, he did abolish _free_ trade unions and those that remained were under full control of the state. Dissidents were eliminated.

    • CB, you describe to a T, what Marxists and quasi-Marxists do. See: American union leadership. First comes the broad, spoon-fed coalition for the revolution; after that succeeds come the purges.

  3. Wow I found it. The most stupid page, in the whole histroy of internet! Fantastic! But I guess this is just a joke, is it not?


  5. Not a joke; reality. But surely not what one is taught in public schools.

    Adolph Hitler was a socialist – an authoritarian leftist, like Barack Obama with his ministerial “czar” structuring, his “green, sustainable development,” his “public-private partnerships” with crony state capitalists, and his friends in anarcho-communist union leadership.

    And neo-Marixm as currently played out is nearly indistinguishable in essential policy from fascism.

    Why do you think they called it the National Socialist Workers’ Party?

    • haha yes, and why do yoy think east Germany was called a Democratic Republic? But I guess you will only use that as an argument against democracy, so I will drop that :)

      Two basic concepts of socialism (in any shape or form), the class struggle and internationalism. Nazist are nationalists and supports national corporatism, i.e as far from all real socialism (in any shape or form)

  6. Yeah,that’s why he shot the communists. :D LOL.

  7. Did we forget about the Night of the long knives? Where Hitler ordered the death and slaughter of influential leaders of the left-wing Strasserist faction. He also killed in this operation many conservatives who were anti-nazi.

    Note that the fascist Nazi party gave themselves a left-sounding name–to wit, “the national socialist German workers’ party.” From their name, one would think they were socialists–i.e. part of the labor movement. However, facts were the exact opposite. Rather than supporting the labor movement like real socialists would, the Nazis broke up picket lines, murdered union leaders, banned worker newspapers, outlawed strikes, and sent the leaders of pro-labor organizations to death camps. The Nazis gave their organization a left-sounding name to garner popular support, and they appealed to imagery that appeared to praise the working class. Yet as soon as Hitler assumed power, he implemented “Operation Hummingbird,” in which all socialists in the Nazi party were executed. Likewise, Mussolini’s Squadistri–the “Blackshirts”–were also hired by private businesses as strikebreakers, union-busters, and as a “front against Bolshevism.” Under Hitler, hundreds of socialists and communists were murdered, and the peasant workers’ movement was demolished by the corporately-funded Fascist squads The fascists were anti-Marxist and against organized labor, while the socialists were Marxists fighting on the labor movement’s behalf. Far from being socialists, the fascists were vehemently opposed to socialism and everything that socialists stood for. Hitler crushed his country’s labor movement as soon as he assumed power.

    All this is confirmed by the economics of fascist regimes. During the 1930s, Italy, Germany, and Spain were strangled with public recession, wage cuts, the banning of strikes, the overturn of workplace safety laws, and the private appropriation of both public property and public industries. At the same time, profits for big corporations like I.G. Farben and the Federazione Industriale were never higher. The fascism of Italy and Germany showered the weapons industries with state money, and stimulated war profits by waging imperialism abroad, as Mussolini did in Ethiopia and Hitler did in eastern Europe. Hitler and Mussolini both eliminated the inheritance tax, cut taxes for the rich, deregulated business, gave public property and public works to private companies, and increased taxes for the poor. (In Italy, child labor was reintroduced as well!) A fascist regime, summarily, is a conservative, pro-business, *capitalist military state*, in which the state’s suppression of organized labor is purportedly justified by appeals to tradition, heritage, patriotism, the family, and other conservative social norms. Fascism is right-wing in its conservatism, right-wing in its alliance with the private sector, right-wing in its policies of imperialism and war, and right-wing in its violent opposition to Marxism and organized labor. Fascism is not socialism, nor is it a left-wing movement of ANY kind.

    This authour and article is a complete joke and shows a complete lack in actual historical study. Absolutely no relation to Obama or Anarcho-Syndicalists.

  8. John in Bachmann's district says:

    Yeah, anyone that tries to whitewash a sick bastard like Hitler doesn’t have the credibility to be heard. Everything he did was for power and aryan supremacy. Stop re-writing history to fit your ideology.

  9. you’re a cretin.

  10. Odd response, to me, if anyone thinks this item promotes Adolph Hitler. Here’s another much more expansive article on Adolph’s neo-Marxian progressivism (a.k.a., fascism).

    Adolph Hitler – Progressive Pioneer

Speak Your Mind