Original posting, 10/26 at 6:30am CT
According to some reports, numerous public and private servants of the United States are, in effect, taking up where Russia has brutally left off, in an attempt to keep America and NATO from initiating an unjust and immoral war in Syria — a war that could bring about World War III. The whistle blowers are not only leaking documents, they are informing numerous journalists, both professional and amateur, of the plans and actions of the CIA in Benghazi regarding Libya’s Qaddafi era stockpile of not only MANPADS rockets but [one source has also referred to] chemical weapons, or at least as Russia understood and they should know.
The integrity of the people involved in this reporting and their numerous, though undisclosed sources have become mutually corroborative, in my opinion. It is assessed as follows.
These are the reports of which we may now be highly confident:
- Ambassador Christopher Stevens and our other killed and wounded individuals were among numerous covert operations personnel engaged in the retrieval of these chemical [edit: if sources are correct] and rocket weapons, perhaps along with other military grade weapons systems.
- They have been in process of delivering weapons (all of these or some of these) to Turkey by sea.
- An Islam-wide imperial caliphate headquartered in Turkey is the aim of Muslim Brotherhood, which, as with NATO, was begun in conjunction with the fascist (or Marxofascist) network (in Muslim Brotherhood’s case, in collaboration with actual Nazis).
- Bringing Arab and Muslim nations under the control of Muslim Brotherhood, allied with NATO is the aim of “Arab Spring” and the “Civil Society” programs.
- Russia discovered the weapons operation, as one might expect.
- Russia and Iran were behind the Benghazi raid, using trained Ansar al-Sharia commandos, a group identifying itself as Al Qaeda in Libya.
- Obama and Panetta (both with strong, historic ties with the old Soviet Russian complex) did not intervene for the rescue and defense of our personnel in Benghazi, and actually told CIA personnel to stand down.
To comprehend the scope of these data and how it may work together, one must understand the Hegelian dialectic model and related to this, the polemic manipulation and control of populations.
These are the reports or conjectures of which we may now be very concerned:
- That some of this chemical weaponry was or is to be used by the Turks, perhaps with the assistance of American special ops personnel, to fire upon some of the Al Qaeda warriors in Syria who have been joining with Syrian rebels fighting Assad.
- That this was to be a false flag attack blamed on the Assad regime, to concoct the inception of military engagement in Syria by NATO forces.
- That Barack Obama has directed the plans involving Ambassador Stevens on 9-11-12 on a hands-on basis.
- The Innocence of Muslims film, nearly unknown by 9-11-12, was planned by contingency, to be declared the reason for any attacks upon the CIA’s Benghazi operations that could feasibly be described as riotous.
- That Obama and Panetta intentionally blew up the operation, cooperating with the Russians/Iranians (which would explain the command not to attempt to rescue stranded U.S. personnel on 9-11-12).
- That Barack Obama may be thought of as a nexus or fulcrum point for the polemic between on the one side, NATO fascists, Saudis, and Muslim Brotherhood (the false “right”) and on the other side, the BRICS nations (and the artificial “left”) potentially moved by the hands of those who have manipulated the Hegelian, controlled polemic model of gradually subverting and controlling the populations of the world for generations.
And these reports on their surface may seem to be misinformation or disinformation, but they should also be investigated:
- That the Obama administration intended for Ambassador Stevens to be kidnapped by Ansar al-Sharia. (Then why set fire to the building into which he fled?)
- That it was planned for him to be traded back to the U.S. in exchange for the Blind Sheik.
Doug Hagmann reports below and lays out information gained by his informant in U.S. Intelligence.This begins at 65 minutes and lasts through the 109 minute mark:
Journalistic sources corroborating portions of this write-up include but are not limited to: Fox News, The Blaze/GBTV, Western Center for Journalism, Sinclair News, and Pat Dollard. Personally, I have at least two direct sources for various pieces of it (which are not employees to my knowledge, of any government intelligence organization).
I expect more to follow. Don’t you?
Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, one of the heroes who lost his life attempting to save Stevens and in so doing violated orders to stand down, spoke with Megyn Kelly today at Fox news (below, second in sequence at time of publishing). His call was itself, groundbreaking news.
From the Weekly Standard and William Kristol, this evening:
Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”
So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.
It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?
We also refer to GatewayPundit.com, citing BlackFive.com, who provide an attestation by an expert in ground-based laser targeting for aerial attack. It declares that our field officer believed his U.S. attack aircraft to be in the air when he laser targeted the enemy mortar fire location that according to the reporting of Fox news, killed or wounded our personnel. I suggest reading the excerpt, then checking out the contextual information in the pages just linked.
Having spent a good bit of time nursing a GLD (ground Laser Designator) in several garden spots around the world, something from the report jumped out at me.
One of the former SEALs was actively painting the target. That means that Specter WAS ON STATION! Probably an AC130U. A ground laser designator is not a briefing pointer laser. You do not “paint” a target until the weapons system/designator is synched; which means that the AC130 was on station.
Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.
If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.
If that SEAL was actively “painting” a target; something was on station to engage! And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!
To those who acknowledge God, who inspired the Old and New Testaments
(and not the Quran, the Communist Manifesto, nor any transnational charters):
Please join in prayer that the full truth is made known plainly, of the entire set
of facts and factors at work behind all that is related here. Such revelations
will have been catalyzed by the injustices and sacrifices of Benghazi, on 9-11-12.