Video Reply to Obamunist Oprah + Mychal Massie + Niger Innis & Booker T. Washington Weighs In

Washington-Booker-race-biz
This is the 150th anniversary of the delivery of the Gettysburg Address, by which Abraham Lincoln commemorated those Americans who fought and died to preserve our nation, free its slaves, and pass it along to us, so we can do the same.

And today, we need to try to free America’s slaves to collectivism – a different kind of slavery. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs meeting B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning, and Bernays/Goebbels’ systematic propaganda, it is mental self-enslavement, to hive-minded deceit, social pressure, and outright extortion, against which we must continue the fight.

And after Priestess Oprah’s race-targeting indictment of America upon foreign soil, it seems many are responding patriotically against such continuous ginning-up of class hostility by the devious neo-Marxists. I tried to “get under the skin” about it in “You People! Letting Oprah & Obama Keep You Collectivist Plantation Slaves?

Those who see themselves as blacks before they understand themselves as Americans in their own minds are turned into not simply and purely American, thus not thoroughly American, and thus, second class citizens. It is all a needless self-torture, individual after individual, after individual in the unnatural, zombiefying, collective mentality.

The sentiments below, by a patriot comrade, “Carol,” are to be appreciated.


Video: “Oprah: Lots of Black People Don’t Like Obama. Stop Playing Your Race Card
 

Massie-Mychal-214wMychal Massie’s commentary, read in the above video:

Why I Do Not Like the Obamas

January 5, 2013

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s? Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s? It seems personal not policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family pic.” The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation.

I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

continues at mychal-massie.com

And I’ll add another video, on Hannity after a prior, much less subtle spewing of inflammatory deceit, that time by Florida’s screw-missing Rep. Alan Grayson. Niger Innis casts adequate light against the concerted lies, set snake-tongued to foment racial warfare in America against our God-given, foundational principles.

Video, “Niger Innis goes on Hannity and destroys race baiters
 

Hat Tip: @postal16 for the B.T. Washington quote & @dakini5 for the “Carol” video; appreciative, compatriots

Embed This


G & M
Subscribe to The Globe & Malevolence, your daily intelligence briefing via Noisy Room, Maggie's Notebook,
Gulag Bound,
and other key sources.
Oh yeah, it's free -- maybe as long as we are.

Comments

  1. Ostensibly, this is a quote of Adolph Hitler, but it could be a quote of the powers behind Barack Obama too. (And perhaps, it is.) It is the Democratic Party’s & fellow globalist/Marxofascist RINO’s way of mental slavery.

    The party takes over the function of what has been society—that is what I wanted them to understand. The party is all-embracing. It rules our lives in all their breadth and depth. We must therefore develop branches of the party in which the whole of individual life will be reflected. Each activity and each need of the individual will thereby be regulated by the party as the representative of the general good. There will be no license, no free space, in which the individual belongs to himself. This is Socialism—not such trifles as the private possession of the means of production. Of what importance is that if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them then own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the party, is supreme over them, regardless whether they are owners or workers. All that, you see, is unessential. Our Socialism goes far deeper. It does not alter external conditions; no, it establishes the relation of the individual to the State, the national community. It does this with the help of one party, or perhaps I should say of one order.

    [...]

    If we feel and experience this great era thus, then we shall not be disturbed by details and individual failures. We shall know then that every road leads us forward, no matter how much it seems to go in another direction. And above all, we shall then maintain our passionate desire to revolutionize the world to an extent unparalleled in history. It gives us also a special, secret pleasure to see how the people about us are unaware of what is really happening to them. They gaze fascinated at one or two familiar superficialities, such as possessions and income and rank and other outworn conceptions. As long as these are kept intact, they are quite satisfied. But in the meantime they have entered a new relation; a powerful social force has caught them up. They themselves are changed. What are ownership and income to that? Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings.

    – Adolf Hitler, as related by Hermann Rauschning

Speak Your Mind

*