Flushing Out RINOs, Neo-cons, Faux Conservatives, Controlled Opposition, and the Clueless

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter14Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn5Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

“There is something on it that he [Obama] doesn’t like.”
Donald Trump on Obama’s birth certificate

Obama's Oath of Office Redux

The existence of the United States as a free republic under the rule of Constitutional law, hinges on how “we the people” deal with the the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS. Remolding the US Constitution into a “living” constitution, a “plastic” constitution, a changeable constitution, is to destroy the Constitution, and the United States as a free republic.

Make no mistake, the question of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS is of vital importance, and seeing as Donald Trump is the only figure of national stature to address the issue, it is incumbent on every constitutional conservative (read that as “patriotic American”) to support Trump, until something better comes down the pike—and I don’t see anyone else coming down the road at the moment.

It is no news that activist judges, ACLU/SPLC lawyers, and many others, have been gnawing away like termites at the US Constitution for many years. What is news, or should be news, is the fact that we have a sitting POTUS whose very existence in the White House may be an affront to, and a direct attack on, the US Constitution.

As Dr. Bob Uda recently wrote, “The birth certificate issue is the number one issue of import because it relates to Obama’s eligibility and the illegality of all of the legislation he has had passed in Congress, his czars, his presidential appointments and directives, and the many Marxist-socialist actions he has taken over the past 2-1/2 years as our usurper president.”  Link

If Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS (which covers much more than just the birth certificate issue) is the most important issue facing America, and Donald Trump is the only nationally recognized figure publicly delving into it, then why would any patriotic American not support Trump? Why indeed.

Many, if not all liberals are globalists, which by definition means that they are anti-American by default. One expects treasonous statements from them, and ridicule of any and all attempts to question Obama’s legitimacy to be POTUS—but what about the “conservatives” who oppose Trump and/or the birthers?

A recent article in the Gotham Resistance correctly points out that “Conservatives/Republicans can’t shout from the rooftops about the erosion of the U.S. Constitution while at the same time insinuating that constitutional eligibility to serve as POTUS means nothing.”  Link

As the title of this article suggests, most “conservatives” who oppose the eligibility issue are either faux conservatives, of one sort or another, or are clueless about the depth and range of the cover-up surrounding Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS. I ask these “conservatives” to tell me what is more important than protecting the sanctity of our founding documents?

The economy? If we regain our economic equilibrium, but continue to lose our spiritual roots as outlined in the Declaration of Independence, then we will end up being nothing but a Godless nation of greedy egotists—unmoored, unattached, and uncommitted to any moral or spiritual foundation—a nation adrift, and easy prey for Islamists and other totalitarian ideologies.  Link

Our other major founding document, the US Constitution, has always been considered detestable by those in favor of top-down rule, be they Communist, Fascist, Progressive, or a variation thereof. If we lose the Constitution as the law of the land, then we lose our freedom, pure and simple. That is what the Far Left (under whatever label) wants.

They consider “we the people” to be much too stupid to govern ourselves, and they are more often then not, power hungry atheists who desire to rule the world (using the temporary aid of the Islamists). The US Constitution has always been a major stumbling block to such people, and their efforts to take over and/or destroy the United States. Link

I repeat, tell me what is more important than defending the US Constitution at this time? How is it that Obama’s eligibility (or more to the point—ineligibility) to be POTUS is not a vitally important concern? If you feel that our Constitution is not worth defending, and hence Obama’s eligibility is not important, then please feel free to “out” yourself. Patriotic Americans will appreciate knowing who you are. TIA.

Steve Cooper recently opined that “Trump has more guts than all of you, and he is putting his life on the line by demanding answers about Obama’s ineligibility. He has the Democrats and Republicans shivering in fear, and what do you idiots do? You attack Trump also.” Link

Cooper puts things a tad more harshly than I would, but by and large I am in agreement with him. Does this mean that I consider all people who diss the eligibility question to be traitors? Most certainly not, they may simply be misinformed, misguided, or lack the mental capacity to handle the various nuances of the eligibility issue. Such people may look and sound treasonous, but I would not call them traitors per se (or idiots).

Most of those who oppose questioning Obama’s past, however, do so either because (1) they are indoctrinated obots who believe anything the “anointed one” tells them, or (2) they are in on the fix, and want their place at the NWO table.

Pastor James David Manning is one of those who believe that America’s propaganda outlets, aka the Lame Stream Media, fall into the latter category. Bill O’Reilly rates his special scorn. He recently labeled “O’Lielly” a birther because he had asked Hawaii for verification of Obama’s birth—“That’s all any birther wants!” shouted Manning.  Link

Although Dr. Manning is sometimes a bit too flamboyant for my tastes, he has my deep respect for his patriotic pursuit of the truth regarding Obama (the “long legged mack-daddy”) over the past few years. The truth shall set us free—amen and boom-shakalaka!  Link

Liberals and faux conservatives may rant, rave, and ridicule with the best, but they never bring anything to the table but the lamest of excuses, and feeblest bits of “evidence” to repudiate birther claims. As always, the liberal strategy when cornered is to crank up the volume, and employ smear tactics. Where in the world would liberals be if you deprived them of the razzle-dazzle distraction of their beloved ad hominem attacks? Link

You should check out the recent CNN interview of Orly Taitz to see an example of the liberal “sound and fury signifying nothing” technique at its finest. When confronted with uncomfortable facts and figures, liberals get loud! Oh, and they get mad and insulted too—“How dare you!”  Link

As much as I may admire liberals for their verbal legerdemain (and it’s hard not to be impressed), bulls—t is still bulls—t, and we must not allow them to get away with their tricks anymore—there is just too much at stake. The smoke-screens, disinformation, and misinformation thrown up around Trump and the eligibility issue is a marvel to behold, but “we the people” must keep our eyes on the prize, and not let all of the hullabaloo distract us from the all-important question of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS.

Unless they start uncovering bodies in Donald Trump’s backyard, he’ll continue to have my support. In fact as things stand, I would probably overlook the odd body or two, because of the over-riding importance of the eligibility issue. I repeat, the birth certificate issue is only one element of a much wider conspiracy—but it is an important element, and Trump is the only national figure looking into it at the moment. For that I can forgive much.

This is not to say that I won’t change my mind down the line—we’ll see how things play out. With all due respect to Mr. Trump, the main reason why I currently support him is because of his stance vis a vis the eligibility issue.

If he should change his tack, or a better qualified candidate should come on the scene, who also brings national attention to Obama’s eligibility—we’ll cross that bridge when, and if, we come to it. For the moment, Trump’s the only show in town, and as such deserves the unqualified support of every constitutional conservative.

In closing let me add that any on the Far Left who feel betrayed by Obama, might want to reread their Alinsky. In his book “Rules For Radicals” Saul Alinsky makes it quite clear that the supreme community organizer, the übermensch, merely uses his followers as pawns, and does not himself fall prey to such silliness as believing in any particular political ideology.

To Alinsky, community organizing is all about acquiring power—nothing more, and nothing less. “The organizer must become schizoid, politically, in order not to slip into becoming a true believer. …Having his own identity, he has no need for the security of an ideology or a panacea.” As Alinsky’s son once noted “Obama learned his lesson well.” Link

If you think that transforming the United States into a spinelessly compliant cog in a NWO/fascist/communist/Islamist hegemony is a swell idea, then by all means attack Trump. Otherwise, I suggest that you defend the US Constitution by backing Trump’s investigation into Obama’s eligibility. If you choose not to defend the US Constitution, then “we the people” will know who, and what, you are. Thank you for the warning.

Laus Deo.

Further articles by Jim O’Neill referring to Donald Trump may be found at Canada Free Press.


Born in June of 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jim O’Neill proudly served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two.  A member of MENSA, he worked as a commercial diver in the waters off Scotland, India, and the United States. In 1998 while attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student, O’Neill won “First Place” in the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award.”  The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with the money she won from successfully suing the National Enquirer for libel.

Over the last few years, Jim has regularly written for Canada Free Press.

Graphics added by Gulag Bound

As we state in the sidebar, the opinions of Gulag Bound’s contributors are their own.  If Gulag Bound ever endorses a candidate for office, it will be designated as such.

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter14Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn5Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

Comments

  1. You forgot to mention being interrupted by a reporter! Reporters: remember the rules: never interrupt the professor as he is lecturing you on the correct interpretation of events you have lived through. After all he is a genius, brilliant in all ways and you are merely a useful idiot!

Speak Your Mind

*