Down with Vichy Republican Collaborators! – Part II of IV

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on LinkedIn0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

By: Thomas Wigand | New Zeal

Vichy Republican Collaborators-Part I

Introduction: History informs us that scoundrels abound.  Current events inform us that scoundrels currently control the GOP.  What follows is the second installment of an abridged version of  a “communiqué” from the book Communiqués From the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. This particular communiqué was first written circa 2012, and then updated in 2015.  Thus, it predates – and so is a precursor to – the current endeavor of Breitbart’s Steven K. Bannon to effect what would amount to “regime change” within the GOP – the goal of which is to electorally expel “Establishment ‘Republicans'” and elect genuinely Conservative ones.  This is stated not to gloat, but to highlight that this is not a problem of recent origin, nor one that is diminishing.  Quite the opposite.  Mitch McConnell’s and Paul Ryan’s sabotage by inaction of the Trump agenda; and recent revelations that one former President Bush voted for Hillary Clinton, and the other withheld his vote from Donald Trump, should dispel any lingering doubts concerning “Establishment ‘Republicans'” being in-bed and under the covers with the Progressive Democrats – and so Establishment Republicans – SWAMP REPUBLICANS – are actual enemies, not weak allies. Those who knowingly and willingly collaborate with evil are …

Down with Vichy Republican Collaborators!

Vive la Republican Résistance!

Our American flag being stomped-on by Bill Ayers: professional revolutionary; domestic terrorist; Professor of Education and political mentor to one Barack Hussein Obama.

It didn’t start with Obama – the Democrat Party of today has metastasized into a political party that would be repellant to a Truman or JFK-era Democrat. The radicals of the 1960’s have succeeded in taking over the party from the inside and, greased with the money of radical labor unions like SEIU, and “philanthropists” like George Soros, have funded and spawned radical groups such as ACORN and MoveOn and Midwest Academy and innumerable others (Yes Virginia, there is indeed a “vast, Left-wing conspiracy”). Aided and abetted by the mislabeled “mainstream media,” this Axis of Collectivism is now rather openly completing the march that it surreptitiously began in the 1960’s – one commenced by working to erode the foundational principles and culture of the United States, invoking the tactics of Marxist theoreticians such as Antonio Gramsci and Andre Gorz and, lest we forget …

Saul Alinsky – Prophet of Progressivism – author of Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals and its dedication to Lucifer at its beginning, the subject of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s college thesis, and creator of the “occupation” of “community organizer” (which, tellingly, was the chosen profession of one Barack Hussein Obama). This Progressive prophet taught his disciples to burrow into the American political system, to appear to be legitimate players and never disclose true intentions, all while working diligently to undermine it from within – and in so doing to pave the way for revolution.

Hillary Rodham (Clinton’s) college thesis on Saul Alinsky, who later wrote “Rules for Radicals” – which included a compliment to Lucifer in its introduction. She picked sides at an early age. In the 2016 elections, the Bushes supported her over Donald J. Trump.

Consider:

Would even the most Liberal Democrat of the JFK era (much less the Truman or Roosevelt era) – when told that within their lifetime their party’s position would be to condone widespread illegitimate birth, and an unwritten edict that one cannot question or criticize the mother for her irresponsibility (now considered acceptable) – have agreed, or would they have laughed and said such a thing is unthinkable?

 Would even the most Liberal Democrat of the JFK era (much less the Truman or Roosevelt era) – when told within their lifetime their party’s position would be to condone homosexual marriage and champion transsexualism – have agreed, or would they have laughed and said such a thing is unthinkable?

 Would even the most Liberal Democrat of the JFK era (much less the Truman or Roosevelt era) – when told that within their lifetime their party’s position would be to condone a refusal to secure our borders from an influx of millions of illegal migrants from Central America – coming here for the express purpose of birthing anchor babies and thereby anchoring themselves onto the American welfare system – have agreed, or would they have laughed and said such a thing is unthinkable?

 Would even the most Liberal Democrat of the JFK era (much less the Truman or Roosevelt era) – when told that within their lifetime their party’s position would be to condone granting those illegal aliens amnesty and inviting them to legally bring their family members to America to latch onto our welfare system – have agreed, or would they have laughed and said such a thing is unthinkable?

 Would even the most Liberal Democrat of the JFK era (much less the Truman or Roosevelt era) –when told that within their lifetime their party’s position would be to condone not just abortion, but partial birth abortion – have agreed, or would they have laughed and said such a thing is unthinkable?

You know the answer(s).

Regarding social issues, Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan spoke disapprovingly of “defining deviancy down.” His Democrat successors not only approve of this redefining, they actively embrace it as a weapon to be deployed socially, politically and economically – invoking the Antonio Gramsci tactic of a “long march through the institutions.” That is, eroding the social and cultural pillars of our society, and thus rendering our culturally weakened country susceptible to Collectivism.

Republican “moderates” – puppeting modern Democrat talking points intended to frame the debate – assert that the GOP has shifted to the right, and too far. Not at all! The positions that we Constitutional Conservatives support trace their genealogy from 1776, and the family resemblance is unmistakable. Rather, as the foregoing examples illustrate, it is the Democrat Party that has shifted radically Left – and exerts a leftward gravitational pull on a GOP that currently is reduced to being a small moon orbiting Planet Progressivism.

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on LinkedIn0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

Speak Your Mind

*