Heather Higginbottom Needs to Explain Marxist Connection

Share on Facebook17Tweet about this on Twitter11Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn1Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

New Zeal

From Big Government, by Trevor Loudon

There has been some speculation that Heather Higginbottom, Deputy Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, may get the top job, as her boss, Jack Lew, leaves to become President Obama’s chief of staff.

Before Ms. Higginbottom is considered for one of the key posts in the U.S. government, maybe she should be asked to explain this photo from October 30, 2001.

Heather Higginbottom, William Julius Wilson, Dottie Stevens, Jack Clark and Robert J. Haynes

The photo depicts Heather Higginbottom, then working for Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, addressing a Boston Democratic Socialists of America organized forum, “Welfare, Children and Families: The Impact of Welfare Reform,” with panelists William Julius Wilson, Dottie Stevens, Jack Clark and Bob Haynes.

Jack Clark, at the time, was Boston D.S.A. Chair, William Julius Wilson  was a long time D.S.A. member and Bob Haynes was President of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, with which D.S.A worked “frequently.”

The Boston D.S.A. logo can be seen on the wall in the center right of the picture.

Despite its relatively innocuous name, Democratic Socialists of America is a radical Marxist organization that believes, according to Democratic Left, Spring 2007, page 9:

Our goal as socialists is to abolish private ownership of the means of production.

One of the panelists in the Boston forum, William Julius Wilson, incidentally addressed another D.S.A. forum in Chicago, 5 years before.

Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25. in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled: “Employment and Survival in Urban America,” the meeting was sponsored by the UofC DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats.

The panelists on that occasion were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago’s 4th Ward, Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District, Professor, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago, Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of D.S.A.’s National Political Committee.

That is the only confirmed incident of Obama’s direct involvement with D.S.A. per se, while he lived in Chicago.

Obama was at the time however close to several known D.S.A, members in Chicago, including his personal physician and mentor in socialized healthcare Quentin Young, his neighbor and friend Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, his friend and political mentor Timuel Black and his political allies Saul Mendelson and Reps Jan Schakowsky and Danny Davis.

Since entering office, President Obama has appointed several D.S.A. connected individuals to influential positions in his administration, including:

If  Heather Higgingbottom is indeed promoted, will it be another hat tip to Obama’s Marxist D.S.A. comrades? Will it be yet another case of socialist nepotism, so rife in the Obama Administration?

Perhaps Ms. Higginbottom, could restore confidence in her office by publicly explaining the exact nature of her relationship to Democratic Socialists of America.


.

Trevor Loudon, top researcher of the global neo-Marxist movement, administrates KeyWiki and NewZeal.

Mr. Loudon’s Obama Files articles are also listed at NewZeal.

Share on Facebook17Tweet about this on Twitter11Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn1Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page

Comments

  1. The fact that Obama is a Communist is an open secret.

    So is the fact that his birth certificate is a blatant forgery.

    Everybody knows it, but few want to publically acknowledge it or admit it.

    Why is it so taboo to do so?

    Because openly admitting and acknowledging these facts somehow makes you a racist.

    See how that works?

    • Why is it so taboo to do so? Because, it is not about racism. It is about the power the dialectic process has on our representatives once they have been cooked by the process. To be cooked by the process, position and principle must be abandoned for the sake of relationship. In other words, oaths, loyalties, positions, principles, borders, and boundaries are surrendered, then trespassed by the consensus of the group (what does the group think?) in exchange for having relationship with the group. Also known as a soviet council form of government. Also known as the Delphi Technique, the consensus process, STW, OBE, NCLB, TQM, etc. It is a powerful brainwashing process, where the cooked representative fears alienation from his own colleagues over the principles he came in the room with, over the promises he gave to his constituents, over his own identity. The process needs to be uprooted from the land before it swallows our children. This where Trevor Loudon, Glenn Beck, Gulag Bound, Commieblasters and other patriots need to focus their attention.

      Why don’t they????????????????

      Inquiring minds want to know.

      http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/Reinventing2.htm

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dtD8RnGaRQ

      http://occupywallst.org/article/enacting-the-impossible/

      http://www.womensgroup.org/998NEWLT.html

Speak Your Mind

*