Al Gore and Eugenics


“I think, first of all, scientists now know that there is, in human nature, a divide between what we sometimes call ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives,’” Gore told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “And it gives an advantage, you can speculate, to the human species to have some people who are temperamentally inclined to try to change the future, experiment with new things, and others who are temperamentally inclined to say, ‘Wait a minute, not too fast, let’s make sure we don’t do anything rash here.’”

This is eugenics and prepping the way for ‘getting rid’ of conservatives. It should scare the very crap out of you. The mask is coming off – entirely.

This is the language of George Bernard Shaw, Margaret Sanger and Hitler. We have come full circle. This is the Fabian Socialist/Progressive movement in all its full hellishness.



  1. Dear Gulag Bound,

    Please do not use this source again in the future as a post like this significantly hurts your credibility as a government watchdog. If you sit back and really understand what Gore is saying then you’ll notice that he is in reality stating that this conservative/liberal mix is an advantage for the human race. He is saying that liberal thinking moves us forward and conservative thinking keeps us from doing anything rash, or stupid. Whether you agree with this sentiment is another story. Then even in the chopped and edited video clip it sounds more like he’s saying that yes it makes politics difficult but it’s an advantage to our species.

  2. @jpat

    I disagree with your statement that a post like this hurts the credibility of the Gulag Bound.

    What I’ve garnered from this piece is to take a step back and view Gore’s statements with how they tie into the Progressive agenda (one that he’s part of). I will admit that I have not listened to the entire interview and that it is edited, however, his message is clearly about “what scientist ‘now’ know about human nature and certain types of people”.

    Further, the progressive agenda is the ‘New World Order’ agenda. We know the NWO agenda specifically requires that the population of the world be reduced. I think we have an interesting correlation.



    (p.s. Conservatives aren’t winning the battles these days so … the rash and or stupid things we are supposed to be stopping Liberals from doing are, well, moving the Progressive Agenda FORWARD ?

    • @Susan

      I see your point and it is clearly well thought out. But I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. There are a lot of things that would make one think depopulation is part of the agenda (e.g. Georgia stones and Agenda 21 map), but unless I have missed some valuable hard evidence this general watchdog consensus appears to be nothing more than conjecture.

      We both seem to share an opinion in that conservative VS liberal ideology being encoded in our DNA is both absurd and dangerous. And I’m not saying that this ‘scientific’ idea isn’t a prelude to some nefarious eugenics campaign. So too could this whole ‘evil gene’ thing be. But if Gulagbound wants to maintain credibility then they should present it in broader terms rather than sharing a post that has clearly skewed Al Gore’s words and turned them into something that they’re not.

      Thanks for your thought provoking comments,


      • @John

        There is a clear consensus among the global elite that overpopulation is the primary cause of the most important problems that the world is facing and that something desperately needs to be done about it. They truly believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and that we will literally destroy the planet if we are left to our own devices … cont. link below

        Have a great week,

      • We have long been plagued by those who seek to explain what is beyond what we know in the material world (and that which is is beyond the scientific method to know) through the material science we at this point do know, or what is projected from it by imaginings based solely upon it.

        Among those who lock themselves into this shade-drawn, Miss Havisham abode lately, are many who believe, since we have computing devices and since we have brains, that our souls are merely the product of brains that behave solely, no pun intended, like organic computers.

        Believers in the chemical, computational theory of the mind are especially interested in seeking how we are “programmed” by our DNA. It becomes religion to numerous of them. (People have an innate need to believe in a Great Other, beyond themselves. That is how we are made and materialists thus tend to worship the ideas of their own minds; Marxists and other “brights” are infamous for it.)

        And Terresa and Susan are correct, as I see it, in warning of the highly motivated engineers among them, who would seek to advance… to the next stage… in the evolution… of man… by breeding (and by selectively not breeding). That is eugenics, and now, even by transhumanism (a desire which Jules Verne and other speculators have warned about, C.S. Lewis too and his cautionary tale also predicted the occult bent this could take, in his book, That Hideous Strength).

        Al Gore hangs with those people maybe more than he visits masseuses – maybe he does the occult thing too, I don’t know, let’s ask him.

        ADDENDUM: Gore’s statement presumes that in all things, man must find or generate improvements from what he already knows. That may be generally true in the material world, but as it would pertain to ultimate truths already found in the realm of what the Bible calls the immutable “Word” and “Spirit,” his implied maxim really does tend to be the verbal trickery of the “progressive.”

  3. I will die on my own terms, thank you very much! The same way I came in, kicking and screaming! If Gore wants me dead, all I can say is “GOOD LUCK WITH THAT”.

  4. Oh and Gore can lead by example.

  5. I don’t feel this post about Gore ruins the credibility of this page.
    Gore IS dangerous. He’s basically changed the way the world views carbon.
    Many scientists, reputable scientists disagree with his view on Global Warming.
    Progressives just say, “The debate is over” when there has been no debate.

    The very liberal Wikipedia describes Gore’s time at Harvard like this, “Although he was an avid reader who fell in love with scientific and mathematical theories, he did not do well in science classes in college, and avoided taking math.”

    I am thinking Gore isn’t making as much money on his previous venture now.
    He mentions Eugenics in one of his books so he is well aware that he could be planting a
    seed. I have to assume he is because we cannot take a chance with this Progressive.

    S.M. Fentz

Speak Your Mind