The Obama/Media Plot to Take Out Soon-to-be President-elect Willard Mitt Romney

The first rule of any clandestine plot is to not make it so patently obvious that those observing your actions are actually able to figure out what you‘re doing.  In other words, ‘We can’t let ‘em see what we’re doing.  If they figure it out, we’re cooked’!  Thankfully, despite all of their leftist chicanery, many–if not most–members of today’s Marxist media simply are not that bright. To wit the overt Candy Crowley/Obama tag-team performance against soon-to-be President-Elect Mitt Romney.

As I wrote last Monday in my column “Candy Crowley and Obama Tag-Team vs. Romney,” New Marxist (aka “Obama”) media darling Candy Crowley was expected to affect an admirable job of stopping Romney each time he presented a truth to Obama that the media’s still-existent messiah couldn’t counter with another of his lies.  So…Candy was chosen to do it for him…or, to be charitable, at least to mislead the public.  And…to her credit she did her job of Obama attack dog most admirably.  She was able to effectively–for a short period of time–verbally stop Romney‘s attack on Obama.  By supporting the “fib” on Obama’s  Libya stance and being close to shouting down Governor Romney’s truth-telling she gave him no place to go–unless Mr. Romney were to call her a liar or a “misleader” on television…which, being a gentleman, he would not do.  That’s what the media counts on.  When Obama ordered her to do so, Crowley obediently stepped in to say that Obama was correct and that he did say the Libyan violence in Benghazi was an “act of terrorism.”

However, on 12 September–the day after the Ambassadorial staff assassinations–Obama had said nothing of the sort.  Earlier in his speech Obama had generically referred to “acts of terror” but, did not specifically conflate it with the Benghazi massacre of American citizens.  In fact, for two weeks after this speech Obama, Ambassador Rice, Hillary Clinton, Press Secretary Jay Carney and others within the Obama syndicate continued to adamantly refer to an obscure anti-Islamist film as the culprit.  Obama even gave a speech at the U.N. in which he–six times–apologized for the USA and blamed the film for the murders.  Suffice it to say, this gave logical rise to the belief that the Obama syndicate had fomented and was continuing to perpetrate the lie in the hopes that the public would buy it.  We did not.  Confirmed almost immediately by the new Libyan president, there was never any protest or riot–whatsoever.  This was a pre-planned and subsequently implemented attack by Al-Qaeda–the offshoot group of both Obama & Hillary-Friends the Muslim Brotherhood.  However, that’s not the thrust of this column.

One thing that I have–thus far–not heard on any of the cable news shows is the following.  Just prior to Crowley jumping in to help Obama with his Benghazi statement, Obama smiled and ordered Crowley to “get the transcript.”  She had it right in front of her and jumped in to defend Obama with information contained on the paper in front of her…which she dramatically waved in the air  This was an immediate response from Ms. Crowley…almost as if she had been waiting for just that moment to deliver her lines.  This takes “media complicity” to a new depth…one at least five levels below pond scum.  The media has been blatantly biased toward the Left in the past but, now they’re not even attempting to cover it up.  I wonder how many times Crowley and Obama had to go over their lines, in order to achieve the possibility an Emmy nomination.

There is one thing that gives me great hope of electing President Romney.  This is that I am not the only one who caught it.  A reader wrote me to tell me that she had, also, caught this.  We-the-People are tuned into the corruption now almost encompassing us all.  We are now paying close attention to everything surrounding this election and, also, are now actively working to correct the dismantling of our country.  With the aging leftist Bob Schieffer–scheduled to “moderate” the final debate on Monday–I suspect that we can expect more of the same protection of Obama and attacks against Romney.  Hmmm.  Even as I write this, I wonder if Mr. Schieffer is being prepped by Team Obama.  We will all be watching for it.

But, keep the faith, folks.  With God’s assistance, help is on the way.  On 6 November 2012, we will elect a new president of the United States and send the old one packing!  Remember, we must vote in numbers never before seen in any election in the United States of America.

“Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked”
–Ephesians 6:16

The media is rewriting history to protect Obama:

Candy Crowley and Obama tag-team v Romney:

Gulag Bound tag: Benghazi


  1. Anyone notice how Crowley disciplined Mitt Romney for bringing up Fast and Furious? The dam is breaking.

  2. IMHO, even more harmful than Crowley’s many sins is this silly process of scoring political debates like high school debates or boxing matches, regardless of whether candidates have true philosophical premises, ideologies, and positions, or workable views and proposals, then reporting “winners” and “losers” that night through the next few days.

    And so come the “scientific” polls, especially when they ask, “Who one the debate?” They might as well ask, “Which one got the most shots in?” or “Which one argued better?”

    A much more important question is, “As reflected in the debate, for which candidate are you more likely to vote?”

    On the day immediately after this debate, when many listeners tended to go to bed after simply hearing the candidates and then told pollsters of their own responses, Romney notched up, in both the Gallup and Rasmussen preference polls. But after people have had it hammered into their heads that technical polling results say Obama won (sort of) when yesterday’s results are included, that bump has subsided per Rasmussen (from +2 to Even in their three day rolling poll) and per Gallup (from +7 to +6 in their seven day poll).

    If one candidate knows in advance how that process works, it can become an exercise in outcome-based, “Delphi method,” manipulation and psyops. They, as Obama does and John Kerry did before him, and with the media’s help, trick out the debate to score points, regardless of not having or conveying a sensible view of how the United States of America is governed. It should be noted that Kerry, we are told, serves Obama in debate preparation. (And, remember, Kerry appears to be a fan and practitioner of Marxist propaganda, having even met with the Communist Vietnamese propaganda minister during that war.)

  3. The Obama Regime will attempt anything to stay in power, and of course, the media plan to do as much promotion for Obama as is possible. Any Lie The Regime States: The Media report out on his wothless lies and propaganda speeches as if they are true. This is very dangerous to maintain a free and open society, when the Media Officially takes on the Role of Propaganda Machine for a Corrupt Government and Administration such as the Obama Regime.

  4. Reading this article has me wondering if I was on Gulag Bound, but then I looked to the right of the comment box and saw the ad for opensecretsdotcom warning us that between Obama and Romney there is no significant difference. That’s the kind of message I expect from Gulag Bound, not the gushing I read in the article.
    I knew Obama was evil the moment I saw him; there was something about that grin of his that made me shiver. It took vetting for me to figure out Romney is just about as bad.
    Under Romney we will still have the TSA, unPatriot Act, NDAA, EPA, Agenda 21 (even the the Republican Party platform is supposed to get rid of it), drones flying over America, surveilance of our every move, NSA capturing all our email and cell phone conversations and posts on blogs, perpetual warfare and the list goes on. And instead of killing O’care, Romney plans on ‘replacing’ it. Can someone tell me with what? Romneycare? O’care’s blueprint? Why does it need to be replaced at all? Why can’t the free market handle it? Why hasn’t Romney come out and said he would end teh ridiculous stranglehold on insurance providers and let them work in whatever state they want?
    What I know after watching many different nominees ascend to the presidency, is that once they get in the WH, they forget the people who put them there and only worry about those who really bankrolled them.
    The fact that Romney isn’t a communist, as appealing as that is, really doesn’t translate into him being a better president when he will do nothing to restore our Bill of Rights. I pray I’m wrong, but I doubt it.


    Osama bin Laden is dead – Ambassador Chris Stevens is dead – and Al-Qaeda is alive and stronger than ever.

    Even the CIA told Obama within 24 hours that there was a terrorist attack at Benghazi: (Pay particular attention to Items #4 & #5 below)

    Mr. President… lied to America. The Ambassador was sodomized and raped while the three staff members were beheaded. For you to tell us that “this was just a bump in the road” shows us that you are more concerned about your re-election than the safety and security of our sons and daughters overseas. You, Mr. President are a complete failure to us and America’s values of life and liberty.

    “Just another Bump in the Road” by Barack Obama! – Benghazi -Gate!

    3. Botched kidnapping?
    4. Obama/Treason charges/weapons:
    5. Gun/Weapons / Documents: (Click on at the 6 minute mark)

  6. 4liberty76:

    Perhaps. But, I plan to give President Romney the benefit of doubt and believe that has the potential to rise–if he (God-willing) chooses to do so–to the level of greatness. If he does not, we will all be gravely disappointed and in trouble. But, we will still NOT be in the imminent danger and destruction we are in now with totalitarian and Luciferian Obama should he receive another term.

    We will neither survive as a country nor a people under 4 more years of Obama…and neither will Israel.

Speak Your Mind