As his Administration enters its last year, he is about to sign four treaties which surrender our sovereignty, enact gun control, cede the power to go to war to the U.N., and tell us how to raise our children

Ban Ki-moon, U.N. Secretary General

It is of our core thesis at Gulag Bound that the American Sovereignties are being warred against, within and without our borders, in large part by globalist, bankster complex -backed politicos and those who manipulate and influence them.

If national sovereignty is forsaken, America’s Declaration of Independence, our national charter is abandoned and our nation is lost; it becomes a colony again in a world where all nations are mere colonies and authoritarian kleptocrats rule the globe.

We suggest further reading and learning, about all of these UN insurgencies.

Updated, below. Originally published February 2, 2012, 7:23pm CST

At CNSnews.com

Romney Told Catholic Hospitals to Administer Abortion Pills

 

 

By Terence P. Jeffrey

February 2, 2012

 

A defining moment in Mitt Romney’s post-pro-life-conversion political career came in his third year as governor of Massachusetts, when he decided Catholic hospitals would be required under his interpretation of a new state law to give rape victims a drug that can induce abortions.

Romney announced this decision — saying it was the “right thing for hospitals” to do — just two days after he had taken the opposite position.

The story begins in 1975….

continues

This is also documented by Kelleigh Nelson in her report, “The Phony Right-Wing, Part 3: Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney,” in Gulag Bound. We will excerpt here, only that article’s segment on abortion:

Romney on Abortion

1994 – Romney stated, “I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country. at boston.com

2001 - While campaigning in Utah, Romney said, “I am not pro-choice.” at observer.com

2002 – While in Massachusetts, Romney quipped, “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose. at boston.com

2004 - Romney again magically became pro-life.  at time.com

2005 – Once again in liberal Massachusetts, Romney spoke these words, “I am actually committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to laws related to abortion and choice.  He even exempted Catholic and Christian hospitals from refusing the morning-after pill in case of rape. at boston.com

Not only does Romney not advocate a ban on embryonic research, he actually supports government funding for the lethal use of the tiniest children for research, demonstrating the falsity of both his conversion and his account of it. And yet many pro-family “leaders” have chosen to ignore the truth, and believe lies. at boston.com

Now on the campaign trail again, he’s saying he’s pro-life, but let’s look at his record.

After he claimed a pro-life conversion, Willard Mitt Romney

• authorized tax-funded surgical elective abortion two years after he claimed he was pro-life. at boston.com
• advocated grisly research on embryos after he claimed a pro-life conversion.
• nominated a pro-abort Democrat judge after he claimed a pro-life conversiongave Planned Parenthood a permanent seat on a state board after he claimed a pro-life conversion.
• bragged that he would continue to defend abortion “rights” after he claimed a pro-life conversion.

His record is absolutely shocking and in another campaign speech he stated he is personally pro-life, but doesn’t want to push his personal religious beliefs on society.  So, society’s cultural decline and the murder of 56 million innocent babies shouldn’t have any commentary from the religious sidelines?

To top it off, the Pro-Life Family Movement discredits themselves again and again.  Many conservatives repeat his false claim of being pro-life including Ann Coulter, saying “Romney governed as a pro-lifer.”  Jordan Sekulow through his father’s organization, ACLJ (American Center for Law and Justice) wrote, “Governor Romney would and still could make a great candidate.”  Jay Sekulow is a CNP member.  Tony Perkins (CNP) at the Family Research Council says Romney is, “solidly conservative across the board,” and a Focus Action Candidate Commentary video from Focus on the Family(CNP) shockingly agrees with Romney that, “on the social issues we are so similar.”  Remember, these groups are members of the secretive Council for National Policy and nearly all are UN-NGO’s.  As UN-non governmental organizations, they must agree with the planks of the Marxist UN to get NGO status.

These groups and people say all this of a man who:

• funded abortion statewide through taxpayer monies
• opposed a Massachusetts Defense of Marriage Constitutional amendment
• said homosexuals should be allowed in the boy scouts
• officially celebrated “Gay-Straight Youth Pride Day”
• sat on the board of directors for a leading purveyor of pornography without opposing the corporation’s exploitation of women
• instituted homosexual marriage
• was ahead of Barack Obama in promoting government controlled health care.

Willard Mitt Romney states, “On every piece of legislation, I came down on the side of life.”

Update, February 4

A narrative of the events in Massachusetts concerning Gov. Romney’s behavior in their state mandate to Christian hospitals to issue abortion pills is presented by the Boston Globe’s “Romney Shifted on ‘Conscience’ Issue,” 2/3/2012.

New Zeal

On Saturday, February 4, thousands of protesters will gather in cities all over the US and in several other countries, to march against alleged US plans to make war on Iran.

In the US, the ultra militant, pro-Cuba and North Korea Workers’ World Party is taking a leading role in coordinating the actions.

From Workers’ World:

U.S.-based anti-imperialist and anti-war organizations have called for protest demonstrations to stop U.S. aggression aimed at Iran on Feb. 4, calling it a “global day of action.” As of Jan. 29, the movement had grown to include protests in 48 U.S. cities, plus cities in five other countries.

The demonstrators demand, in a leaflet posted on a few of the endorsing organizations’ websites: “No war, no sanctions, no intervention, no assassinations against Iran.”

While the organizations involved have varied assessments of the Iranian government, they all see that any intervention by U.S. imperialism in the oil-rich Asian country not only threatens the Iranian people, but could also be a stepping stone to a much wider war in Asia.

Workers’ World spoke on January 28 with Sara Flounders, a WWP leader co-director of the International Action Center, one of the original organizations to call for the Feb. 4 action.

“The quick response to the emergency action shows deep apprehension about the threat of war,” said Flounders. “Different combinations of the endorsing groups have already called for actions in 48 cities around the United States. Each of these groups has its own political program and analysis of the world situation, but they have agreed to give priority to fighting against this new and possibly devastating war that threatens humanity.

“Sometimes people in the U.S. fail to see that sanctions are in themselves an act of war. Those the U.S. and the United Nations carried out against Iraq from 1990 to 2003 cost the lives of more than 1 million Iraqis, including at least half a million children. The Iran sanction measures also impose sanctions on any country that doesn’t go along with the U.S. blockade. This drives up oil prices and threatens to unhinge the economies of the poorest countries.

“International support, considering the short time span, has been good,” continued the IAC leader. “Demonstrations are planned in Ireland, Norway, India, Bangladesh and Canada.”

Significantly, the protests are at the behest of an Iranian based organization, The House of Latin America. According to Workers’ World:

Activists in Iran are also concerned about these dangers. The Iranian organization called The House of Latin America has been contacting its friends in the Western Hemisphere to work toward actions on Feb. 4.

And what exactly is the House of Latin America in Iran?

According to Workers’ World Party supporter Phil Wilayto, writing in MRzine in October 2010:

HOLA was started about five years previously to promote solidarity with the peoples of Latin America. Its activities have included organizing solidarity trips to Nicaragua and Venezuela, hosting a talk by Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, translating a book by Hugo Chavez  of Venezuela, and facilitating a visit to Iran by the son and daughter of Che Guevara  to participate in a commemoration of the 40th a anniversary of Che’s death.

Wilayto goes on to explain HOLA’s role inviting Workers’ World Party fronts International Action Center and the ANSWER Coalition to Iran to discuss building a movement to defend the Islamic Republic.

In mid-October 2010, a nongovernmental organization in Iran called the House of Latin America, or HOLA, invited several anti-imperialist organizations from North America to Tehran with the goal of building the movement against war and sanctions against Iran. Among those who attended were representatives of the International Action Center, ANSWER Coalition,Toronto Coalition Against the War , and the American Iranian Friendship Committee.

Now, as a result of the aforementioned meeting with North America-based activists, HOLA has set up a new campaign called Solidarity with Iran (SI) and initiated an English-language international appeal, detailing U.S. threats to Iran and defending Iran’s right to develop nuclear power for peaceful energy purposes.

This photo of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a House of Latin America in Iran book launching with Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, would indicate that HOLA is almost certainly a state sponsored organization.

The book launch of Enghelab-e Venezuela, the Persian translation of Hugo Chávez Frías: un hombre, un pueblo (Marta Harnecker's interview with Chávez) by the House of Latin America in Iran

The fact that an Iranian organization, probably state directed, is bidding US communists to try and influence US government policy, should be more than enough grounds to spark an FBI investigation.

.

Trevor Loudon, top researcher of the global neo-Marxist movement, administrates KeyWiki and NewZeal.

Mr. Loudon’s Obama Files articles are also listed at NewZeal.

New Zeal

Florida Communist Party USA leader Josh LeClair interviews Scott Douglas, executive director of Alabama’s Greater Birmingham Ministries. Douglas is leading the charge against Alabama’s comparatively tough new anti-illegal immigration laws.

Douglas poses as a man of faith, a religious leader of Birmingham’s black community.

In reality, Douglas was a long time Communist Party USA member, from at least 1972 to 1991. He was a member at one point of the Party’s Religious Commission, the body charged with expanding communist influence in the churches. In 1991, Douglas left the Party to support the breakaway Committees of Correspondence.

Douglas, like many former CoC members, appears to have returned to the Communist Party orbit.

Scott Douglas on the Colbert Report.

Scott Douglas, executive director of [[Greater Birmingham Ministries]], appeared on the Colbert Report on Monday night to mark Martin Luther King’s birthday celebration.

Douglas has been with GBM since 1993, and has recently taken on the fight against Alabama’s tough immigration law, which is known as HB56. Before the interview, Colbert described Douglas as “a community organizer who believes anti-immigration is the civil rights issue of our time.”

During the interview, Douglas described HB56 as a law that “burdens family, breaks up families, forces to split up our families, burdens taxpayers and makes law enforcement take on the extra job of checking out people at traffic stops.” Douglas argued against a patchwork state immigrant law system in which all 50 states have their own anti-immigrant laws, and in favor of a comprehensive federal immigration law “that’s just and fair for everyone.” Douglas also mentioned the argument that HB56 diverts scarce law enforcement resources to immigration enforcement, a view shared by Jefferson County Sheriff Mike Hale and other Alabama law enforcement officials.

At one point, Colbert told Douglas that he is unable to see color (a long running Colbert Report gag), and asked if Douglas is Hispanic.

“I am a proud African-American, a proud Alabamian and a proud United States citizen,” Douglas replied.

.

Trevor Loudon, top researcher of the global neo-Marxist movement, administrates KeyWiki and NewZeal.

Mr. Loudon’s Obama Files articles are also listed at NewZeal.

New Zeal

Members of a U.S. congressional panel expressed concern Thursday that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s ties to several Latin American leaders could pose a threat to U.S. national security. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs that senior Iranian officials are “now more willing to conduct an attack in the United States.“  He said Iran is trying to penetrate and engage in the Western Hemisphere.

The chairwoman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, said some people might question whether the Iranian-Latin American connection is a threat, but she said there is cause for concern.

“Iran’s [President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad recently returned from his ‘Tour of Tyrants’ trip to visit Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Ecuador.  Media reports have indicated an increased presence of Iran’s Quds Force in these countries and offices of Iran’s intelligence services surfacing throughout the region,” said Ros-Lehtinen. “The fact that the military arm of a state-sponsor of terrorism has its operatives within multiple countries in our hemisphere is certainly cause for alarm and merits congressional focus.“

Obama administration officials say the United States is keeping a close watch on Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s ties to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. During Ahmadinejad’s recent visit to Venezuela, he and Chavez praised each other and joked about concerns in the West about Iran’s relations with Latin America.

Could be? Could be?????? COULD BE??????????????????

The latest in Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney (and George Soros):

Video brought to the Gulag by Tallulah Starr

Posted prior in Gulag Bound, “Newt Gingrich: Soros is Right, I am the Real Threat,” January 31

The above follows “George Soros: ‘Isn’t… much Difference,’ Romney vs. Obama,”January 28, reshown here:

George Soros: “If it’s between Obama and Romney there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them.”

This should be “all anyone needs to know,” as a reminder to do one’s civic duty, to make sure Mitt Romney does not become United States President.

Time is fleeting, so instead of regurgitating context and commentary, we will show this article on the same, in MailOnline (h/t: @OhSuzyQz) and…

George Soros says there ‘isn’t all that much difference’ between Romney and Obama

By Toby Harnden

Last updated at 12:32 AM on 28th January 2012

This isn’t exactly the kind of endorsement the Romney campaign is looking for. It’s probably even less welcome than the purported nod for Newt Gingrich from crooked GOP congressman Randy ‘Duke’ Cunningham sent from his jail cell.

Speaking in Davos, gathering place for the global elites and upscale chattering classes, billionaire investor George Soros – loathed by conservative activists for his ‘zillion-dollar left-wing radical agenda machine’ – seemed to be pretty much OK with the notion of a Romney presidency.

‘Well, look, either you’ll have an extremist conservative, be it Gingrich or Santorum, in which case I think it will make a big difference which of the two comes in,’ he told Chrystia Freeland of Reuters in a videotaped interview. ‘If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them.’

continues

…we fervently suggest clicking on the tags below for “Mitt Romney,” “George Soros,” and “failed state strategy.”

From the fine forum at RedState.com (a name that may always cause me to cringe, I confess) posted in its entirety with an invitation to go see it:

Oh MY!! Gingrich Really Did Save Reagan Revolution!

---

Posted by quill67
Tuesday, January 31st at 5:58PM EST
2 Comments
Recommenders: finallyhadenuff, Finrod, clowngirl, andystone, Black River Wolf

---

Brian Domitrovic author of econoclasts who claims to be “the only professional historian ever to have written on the topic (Enactment of Reagan’s Supply-Side tax cuts) writes “by the summer of 1981, the supply-side revolution was no sure thing.”

His article in Forbes states:

“In his first months in office, in early 1981, Reagan actually dithered on moving on his tax cut. He conceded to watering down Kemp-Roth, and he actually had to be convinced by Democrats that the top rate of the income tax had to be taken down all at once, instead of in phases.

Smelling blood, in spring of that year Democrats started to offer alternatives to Reagan’s tax cut, in the form of smaller, more “reasonable” tax cuts. Crucially, these did not index the tax code against inflation, as the Reagan bill would soon propose and has been a beloved staple in the tax code since indexing came into effect in 1985.

In stepped – Newt Gingrich. Gingrich, a second-term Representative, led an “Economic Recovery Working Group” in the House whose purpose was to show “what each member can do to help the Reagan tax cut” against its Democratic alternatives.

The group gave daily briefings and issued strategy memos on how to get the job done in the House. “Emphasize that the Reagan program is a real tax cut; and that the O’Neill/Rostenkowski program will mean a real tax increase for most Americans by 1984” was the gist of one memo. This particular point is the one Reagan would seize on in the famous chart (designed by Entin) that he presented to the American people in a televised address in late July, which closed the deal in Congress.

Had these actions not been taken:

had people like Newt Gingrich not acted in 1981, we would have had the alternative tax cut that would have been unrecognizable from any of Jimmy Carter’s tax shavings  of the 1970s.

We have heard much in the last week or two about how Gingrich was a critic of Reagan, how he really had nothing to do with Supply Side policies, and how his claims to part of the Reagan revolution were false. I even mistakenly wrote that Gingrich learned from Reagan–that he was a back-bencher, a student.

Now it is apparent that Gingrich was not just a student, he was not a back-bencher. Gingrich was more like a colonel in Reagan’s Revolution. He fought for the Reagan revolution and the LIES that we have been told about his role, lead me to say:

Florida: You have been lied to. Now it will be up to future states and contests to correct for the misinformation you were given. I ask people in the states to follow to consider carefully when you hear the establishment claiming this or that about Gingrich– just remember they tried to rewrite history and leave out the invaluable contributions of one Newt Gingrich.

Official portrait as Speaker of the House

“Those were the days.”

That was Newt Gingrich, a man with a record against which Mitt Romney’s is hideous. (See, “Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney; Comparing Conservative ‘Products of Work.’“)

Nancy Reagan knew. She was there.

Rick Santorum? What has he ever said about Agenda-21 and other U.N. initiatives, which would together instill global government, with America becoming a colony once more, along with every other nation on the face of the earth? Effectively, Santorum is becoming a draw horse for Mitt Romney, anyway.

Ron Paul? He saps potential votes, too. While Gingrich is adopting more of Paul’s sounder positions, we have to save America, before we can worry about culling through libertarian ideas, to select those which are authentic to our founders’ intentions.

It is a shame that Gingrich has been wayward in his political behaviors and communications.

But, it could well be our fatal tragedy, if American authentists did not recognize his stated intentions to fight for our Sovereignties when we so desperately need just that, and if globalist bankster backed Mitt Romney were elected president. That is likely only to give us the other side of Barack Obama’s coin, as in thirty pieces of silver selling us out to global banking system bailouts with strings attached to “global governance,” after the looming, global economic collapse hits us.

What would Ronald Reagan do, with his 2012 Primary ballot?

I think Newt Gingrich would reassure him once again.

h/t: @Afterseven

New Zeal

Tedium alert, but you should endure watching this to see how the opposition thinks.

In this 33-minute video, Communist Party USA Chair Sam Webb presents “Foundations of Marxist methodology: How to make change and win millions to socialism in the American political, social and economic framework.”

Recorded during a 2011 seminar in Los Angeles on Marxism, this “video is an excellent tool for CPUSA and YCL members, friends and collectives to discuss and deepen understanding of Marxist methodology.”

Pretty mundane presentation style, but Sam Webb makes it very clear that the party continues to see Barack Obama and the Democrats as allies on the road to socialism.

Since this item in BuzzFeed Politics is short, we show it in its entirety:

Ron Paul’s Biggest Supporter Is A Bilderberger, International Financier

World’s collide.The gay libertarian tech investor Peter Thiel, enthusiast of post-national ocean states, backed the SuperPAC.

Posted Jan 31, 2012 9:21pm EST

The largest donor to a SuperPAC supporting Ron Paul is Peter Thiel, the sort of ultra-wealthy, super-national figure Paul and his supporters love to hate.

Thiel — who gave $900,000 to the pro-Paul group Endorse Liberty — made his fortune as the co-founder of PayPal; he was also an early investor in Facebook, and is now a major player in the world of high-tech venture capital. He’s also a devoted libertarian and devoted Republican: He hosted a fundraiser for the confrontational gay conservative group GOProud at his grand apartment off Union Square in 2010.

Thiel is also a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group, the elite, invitation-only conference that’s the frequent subject of conspiracy theories.

“They probably get together and talk about how they’re going to control the banking systems of the world and natural resources,” Paul said in 2008.

Thiel shares, though, Paul’s anti-government, and anti-Establishment, impulses. He has funded a prize to encourage talented students to drop out of college, and is a major supporter of the cause of “Seasteading,” creating independent, water-borne cities free of national law.

h/t James Carter

A previous item by Cliff Kincaid in Gulag Bound refers to this man: “Republicans Raise Money for Gay Agenda.” Further information about Thiel may be found online.

It should also be underscored that Ron Paul’s libertarian political philosophy is revisionist philosophy, not the authentic political philosophy of America’s founders and our Constitution’s framers. Libertarianism makes a mistake similar to that of progressivism, in positing its maxims, vision, and goals as if our Constitution may be removed from the foundational principles of the Declaration of Independence., our national charter.

Also, Rep. Paul’s Austrian School economics are not only inauthentic to America’s foundational economic philosophy (based  in large part upon Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and in turn, the principles of the Bible) it is an inherently globalist economic philosophy which eschews national guardianship of the economic health and freedom of sovereign nations. As such, it is subject to the kind of Mutually Assured Economic Destruction that we currently face, stemming from the world’s crises of European dominated government insolvency and banking hubris.

And gold standard? We had better find out where the gold really is, and how much, before we ever move to a gold standard. Further, any standard of a nation’s currency must be that nation’s standard, not global. I humbly suggest we think of what is meant by calling money “Sovereign” and then ponder what happens with global currency and concomitant global governance in the prophecy of the book of the Revelation to John.

Nations are accountable to God, each for its own nation’s governance. Governance of a nation’s sovereign currency is a key element of this, as is governance over its preservation of that nation’s Right to Life and its acknowledgment of the essential meaning of marriage, any sane and functional culture’s fundamental societal relationship.

Personally, would I vote for Ron Paul over Barack Obama? Easily. Of the four GOP candidates, I would refuse to vote for the bankster-backed, Agenda-21 implementing Hollow Man, Mitt Romney, if he were nominated. I suggest looking to and questioning Newt Gingrich, who still has a chance to win the GOP nomination and who is apparently shifting from previous positions to committing to stand for the Sovereignty of the United States of America. Rick Santorum’s record is not unalarming and that should be presented in Gulag Bound by Kelleigh Nelson, soon.

Meet Scott Ryan, a veteran Republican organizer and a man of integrity of mind, living in Palm Beach County, Florida. Scott knows the right melody, one quite harmonious to the sentiments of true patriots found at various stages of sight reading expertise.

But the left-handed rhythm driving this score is of an America continuously subverted by an orchestrated combination of tycoon transnationals and falsehood neoconservatives domineering the “right,” set up to be opposed by radical Marxists fomenting revolution on the “left.” If one does not see this, one fails to understand fundamental, neo-Marxist, dialectic manipulation.

They are globalists all, and all are following the money controlled by the Old World Order’s European-based, central bank complex.

They hate the dissonance of competition. And the competition they hate is Popular Sovereignty within sovereign nations which maintain nationally guarded, free economies, in control of their own resources. In the mind of the globalist beast, this must be defeated wherever it is found – and as George Soros, one of their more obvious minions has stated, America is their chief obstacle.

Previously, we pointed out the linkage between Romney politics and Alinsky politics. Perhaps the most infamous Alinsky tactic is to, “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Currently, the main target is the one calling himself the main “threat,” to the Soros strategy for America’s failure, the most viable candidate speaking up for American Sovereignty, Newt Gingrich.

Ladies and Gentlemen, as our baritone hero below leads in exposing Mitt Romney, we the Bound dare become angry at conspiracy.

The 2012 Overture, Florida Primary Arrangement

TableOfWisdom.com
Tuesday, January 31, 2012

The South & the Mid-West Must Defeat the Romney Sleaze Machine

As a Florida resident I have to apologize to conservatives for what happened here in our primary election. There’s an axiom regarding Florida that if you are –in- Florida, “you have to go north in order to go south”. The remnants of “old Florida” went solidly for Newt but predictably areas like Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County where I live are areas of transplanted northerners who are known for telling us “this is how we do it up north”, which begs the question – if it’s so great in New York, New Jersey, Boston… – then why did you come here?

The same thing has been done to the state of North Carolina where northerners, especially eastern seaboard, are violating their fiduciary duties to posterity by voting for leftists like Romney in their home states. THEN, when they lose their jobs or they retire, they don’t want to pay the concomitant taxes which come from voting for leftists, so they relocate to Florida and Charlotte or Raleigh North Carolina and “repeat the causes to which they are owing and which again will produce them” as the Roman orator Cato once said in regard to the “vast fund of stupidity in human nature”.

Be that as it is, we are counting on the real South, what’s left of it – to do the right thing and make up for our delusions.

I must confess that yesterday I discovered that I had not fully conducted my own due diligence on Mitt Romney. I dismissed him early on as a liberal imposter after learning that he –invented- Obamacare and after seeing him propitiously flip his position on virtually every significant issue that matters to conservatives just in time to run for him to President.

Yesterday as I was doing some research for my video published this morning called “A Mitt Romney nomination could be GOP Death Knell” (below).

 

I was going through the veritable litany of liberals being used to –sell- Romney to the people who like voting for salt & pepper hair and nice jaw lines. Some of the names being utilized to sell him are of course none other than John McCain, Bob Dole, Charlie Crist & even Tom Brokaw (to his consternation). But I was wondering if I might add his fellow Massachusetts liberal Senator Scott Brown to the list.

What I found is that the FACT that this character is a leftist was so overwhelming – that I stopped doing my research too soon. This guy is the gift that keeps on giving (to the Democrats) and it’s no wonder that Obama and the Dems are salivating at the prospect of Mitt being the GOP nominee.

When I “Googled” the words mitt + romney + Scott + brown I found another -hair brained- scheme created by Mitt that although may not be the albatross that his healthcare program is – it is perhaps every bit as appalling to basic sense and conservative principles. Romney’s other hair-brained scam was called “Wheels for Welfare” and it was so expensive that Scott Brown opposed it and the liberal governor who succeeded him scrapped it because it was so exorbitant.

According to This piece at ABC, “it was a program that gave welfare recipients free cars, free car repairs, free insurance and even free AAA.” (Link to article at abcnews.go.com)

There is plenty of information regarding this legalized scam all over the Internet. It certainly gives us further insight into the type of “expertise” and business acumen we can expect a President Romney to bring to the table. After all, aside from spending tens of millions of dollars slandering and libeling his challengers who have track records with distorted and out of context sleaze, his SINGULAR theme upon which he is running is “I was a businessman who made hundreds of millions of dollars; therefore I will fix the waste in Washington DC.”

Well, there we have an example of exactly the type of sagacity we should expect if Mitt Romney were to secure his legacy and become President – not only cash for clunkers – but free auto insurance, free auto repairs and even free towing! “Now how much would you pay?”

Moronic.  It really does require a willful suspension of disbelief to contend that this fellow would do anything but betray our party like every legacy seeking liberal who has hi-jacked our party nomination before him.

I know Newt has baggage – but so does our first self-admitted cocaine snorting President. Obama is not about to open the door to the valley of dry bones in HIS closet. The morality question was never broached by John McCain and certainly not by the media in the past election. It is certain that Barack and the O-media will damned well never make this election into a beauty pageant of moral rectitude because they know that Newt will pounce on the opportunity to compare histories of which Obama voting drones know little.

So despite what the man with holy underwear, Mitt Romney contends while dredging up Newt’s past sins, the contentions are as shallow as Mitt Romney’s campaign platform.

In a closer to perfect world I would today have voted for Jim Demint. Instead I voted for a conservative who can be judged as such my looking at the totality of his record – versus an imposter who has to run on John McCain, Bob Dole endorsements and Tom Brokaw sound bites.

I am truly sorry and embarrassed for those, including Ann Coulter who have been seduced by this modern day Elmer Gantry.

I have voted for every Republican since turning 18 in 1988 – BUT this time around, if Mitt Romney is the nominee, I will NOT debase my country or myself by voting for this sleaze.

For the past two months of being deluged by the underhanded commercials onto which Romney has attached his name, and after watching his sophomoric behavior at his rally in The Villages (Florida) yesterday where he taunted Newt Gingrich – I can say emphatically that this is no gentleman and this is no statesman.

3rd party or independent conservative it will be if Mitt Romney is the GOP nominee.

Contact: mrarbitrage@tableofwisdom.com

We’ve gotten more visitors to the Gulag in the past few days, thanks in large part to Sharon Rondeau and The Post & Email – also thanks to the brave Constitutional activists seeking a just determination in presidential eligibility!

There are many things to write about. Too many – especially after yesterday’s events in Florida. As you may know, it is a grave matter, the question of whom we elect this year and I have a grave warning about it.

We may be just a bit sporadic for the rest of the week, especially in my own posting, as some changes are made and some reinforcements added to our editing team, but what we post will be important.

Keep running with the Bound.  America desperately needs to know what we expose.

- AW

New Zeal

This is Allen West at his best.

Congressman West even mentions Ayn Rand’s great novel “Atlas Shrugged.”