There’s the hashtag. Further explanation is not necessary for many.

If you do wish further explanation, simply Web search or search in Gulag Bound, using these terms:

• obama document fraud cold case posse
• obama selective service fraud
• obama social security number used
• obama college records foreign student
• natural born citizen vattel minor
• obama infanticide Illinois Senate Jill Stanek

This is the sequel to the Part I exclusive published by Right Side News on Wednesday, August 1st.
In Part I, Trevor Loudon, who was among the first to expose Obama’s radicalism, exposes the relationship between President Obama and a high level, pro-Soviet operative, Alice Palmer, actively involved with known Soviet and communist front organizations at the height of the Cold War. She worked closely with the future U.S. president for several years, in the same socialist and communist networks that dominated the left side of Chicago politics…

Also in Part I of James Simpson’s report, speaker Konstantin Preobrazhensky, a KGB defector, explained in vivid detail how and why the Soviet Union became the real force behind Muslim terrorism, including al Qaeda. We continue with Part II by James Simpson.

Cliff Kincaid of America’s Survival held the critical National Press Club event on July 19th: The Vetting: Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection. At this pivotal time, we face a national election that may well determine the fate of our great country. And as America goes, so goes the world.

Thus, it is not an exaggeration to describe this as the most important press conference in U.S. history, because it explicitly details, with new facts and more evidence than ever presented in one place at one time, from extensive, highly credible sources, the dangerously extremist nature of President Obama and the true goals of his virulently anti-American, radical leftist administration.

It further reveals how a huge network of U.S. and foreign communist and hard left organizations connected to this President has colluded with radical Islam for decades to oversee the destruction of their mutual enemy: America. Overshadowing all is the malevolent Soros network and the billions he and others like him are devoting to facilitate this goal.

This information simply must reach the electorate before November.

In kicking off this conference, Kincaid announced: “Our July 19 conference fulfills the late Andrew Breitbart’s promise to finally ‘vet’ the president. The diabolical dangers of Marxism and radical Islam must be exposed. It is time for the shocking truth about Obama and his agenda to emerge.”

Frank Marshall Davis’s Influence on Barack Obama

Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College and Executive Director of Grove City’s Center for Vision and Values. He is also a prolific author. His presentation at the Kincaid conference focused on his latest book, The Communist, Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor. Other notable recent works include “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism” and “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.”

In The Communist, Kengor delves deep into Davis’s past to produce an extensively documented biography of the man who had perhaps the most influence on Barack Obama of anyone in his life. Davis was a highly influential member of the American Communist Party, CPUSA member #47544, according to the FBI. He spent a lifetime engaged in pro-Soviet, communist activities. He likely moved to Hawaii to engage in surveillance for the Soviets, who considered the islands – not yet a U.S. state – of key military significance. Kengor shows just how deep Davis’s communist ties were, and how important he was to Obama’s worldview. Some highlights follow:

• Obama repeatedly describes Davis’ tremendous influence on him in his book “Dreams from My Father.”
• Davis is mentioned 22 times in “Dreams,” at least once in every section of the book.
• Despite his pivotal importance, Obama never once identifies Davis by his full name.
• All references to “Frank” have been purged from “Dreams” audio excerpts.
• From the 1920s, American communists attempted to recruit black Americans.
• From the 1920s, the Soviet Union was sending money to American blacks.
• The Soviet goal was to create a separate “Negro Republic” in the American south.
• Later they would join revolution to help create “Soviet America”.
• Davis joined the Communist Party in about 1943, after the Hitler/Stalin Pact was signed.
• Davis founded and edited the CPUSA’s Chicago Star newspaper; regularly wrote virulently anti-American “Frank-ly Speaking” editorials.”
• Davis had a “direct line to the Kremlin;” and obtained exclusive interviews for a Star reporter with Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov.
• Soviet agents I.F. Stone and Lee Pressman wrote for the Star.
• Star editorial writer Howard Fast was a communist Hollywood screenwriter and winner of the Stalin Prize.
• Two top Obama aides are connected to Davis cronies.
• Vernon Jarrett (father-in-law of top Obama advisor, Valerie Jarrett) and Robert R. Taylor (Valerie Jarrett’s grandfather) knew and worked with Davis in Chicago on a communist project, the “American Peace Mobilization.”
• Communist and suspected Soviet agent David Canter worked with Davis in Chicago.
• Canter later mentored Obama’s chief strategist, David Axelrod. Axelrod coined the “Hope and Change” slogan.
• The Soviet Union had a strong strategic interest in Hawaii, not yet a state when Davis moved there.
• The Canter family and others purchased the Chicago Star to facilitate Davis’ move and renamed it “The Progressive.”
• The Communist Party founded the Honolulu Record in August 1948, just in time for Davis’ move.
• Davis picked up at the Record where he left off, writing the same “Frank-ly Speaking” column until the paper’s demise in 1958.
• FBI file shows that Davis was getting paid by International Longshoremen and Warehousemen’s Union, ILWU, run by CPUSA Central Committeeman Harry Bridges and was recognized as the union most penetrated by communists.
• Davis used a camera with telescopic lens to photograph Hawaiian shoreline.
• Davis’ editorials for both the Star and the Honolulu Record consistently followed the Soviet line.
• For these and other Communist Party activities, FBI suspected Davis was working for the Soviets.
• The FBI placed Davis on the Security Index. Upon outbreak of war with the USSR, Davis was subject to immediate arrest.
• Davis was listed as a communist party member in a 1957 Senate Judiciary Committee report titled “Scope of Soviet Activity in the United States” which covered subversive activities in Hawaii.

Until 1989, the Soviet Union controlled, directed and bankrolled all activities of the American Communist Party. All CPUSA members were therefore de facto Soviet agents, knowingly or otherwise. From all appearances, CPUSA member #47544, Frank Marshall Davis, knew it. He was very likely assigned to Hawaii specifically for surveillance and subversive purposes. So Frank Marshall Davis, Soviet agent or communist dupe, was the person with the most profound influence on our sitting President. Is Barack Obama similarly disposed? It certainly appears that way. And the next speaker presented a case that furthers this thesis.

Dreams from My Real Father

Joel Gilbert is the president of Highway 61 Entertainment in Los Angeles. He is a contributing editor for the national security and foreign policy website FamilySecurityMatters.org and has appeared frequently as a foreign policy analyst on national radio shows. He is the writer and director of the notable films: Atomic Jihad: Ahmadinejad’s Coming War for Islamic Revival and Obama’s Politics of Defeat and Farewell Israel: Bush, Iran, and the Revolt of Islam.

At the Kincaid conference, he spoke about his new, groundbreaking film, “Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Reds and Deception.” At first blush, I, like Cliff and others, was skeptical. But Gilbert extensively researched his subjects for this film, and uncovered previously unknown information about Obama’s family that lends strong credibility to his argument. Gilbert’s film convincingly advances the thesis that CPUSA member Frank Marshall Davis was not only Obama’s ideological father, but his biological father as well. It presents a “cohesive understanding of Obama’s deep-rooted life journey in socialism.” Evidence includes:

• A series of nude photos of Obama’s mother, Anne Dunham, taken by Davis at his Hawaii home when Dunham was five weeks pregnant with Obama.
• The photos were sold to be used in a men’s mail order nude photo album.
• Davis wrote extensively of sexual encounters with “Anne” in his autobiographical novel, “Sex Rebel Black” and she was the subject of one of his erotic poems.
• There are documents showing that Dunham attended college in Seattle, Washington immediately following Obama’s birth and was not in Hawaii with Obama Sr. as Obama claims.
• Obama Sr. was already married to a woman in Kenya and had children of his own.
• Marrying Anne would allow Obama to extend his stay.
• Obama Sr. was brought to America through a CIA program and was welcomed to Hawaii by Anne Dunham’s father, Stanley.
• Stanley Dunham had a strong personal incentive to hide his daughter’s relationship with Davis from authorities.
• Obama’s physical features, including his height, build, facial features and freckles are very similar to Davis, but nothing like Obama Sr. The correct pronunciation of “Barack” is “BEER-ick,” a pronunciation Obama never uses.
• Obama’s poem, “Pop” was written about Davis.

This and other information points to the conclusion that Davis was in fact Obama’s real father. Anne Dunham’s marriage to Obama was a sham to disguise her illegitimate pregnancy by Davis, a communist and probable Soviet agent.

Gilbert suggests that Obama’s birth certificate originally said “Father Unknown.” This thesis was also advanced by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s cold case posse when they demonstrated that Obama’s published birth certificate had been tampered with. Gilbert unveils additional discoveries:

• Obama joined the communist May 19th organization according to a former member.
• May 19th was a support group for the Weather Underground.
• May 19th members went to Cuba to be trained in explosives by Cuban intelligence.
• May 19th members were involved in the 1981 Brinks robbery, murdering two policemen and a Brinks’ employee.
• Obama likely met Ayers while at Columbia.
• Obama attended a Socialist Scholars Conference in the spring of 1983 with Bill Ayers.
• Obama was a “red diaper baby” as was Obama strategist David Axelrod.

Gilbert further catalogs Obama’s lifetime among the radical left which he has covered with deception and lies. Obama has pushed a phony, contrived background to mask an agenda unacceptable to most Americans.

In closing, Gilbert related that he has received many emails from viewers of the DVD expressing their concerns about Obama. One notable message from a Vietnam veteran worried that America is about to lose its freedom and asked: “What did I fight for? Please can you get this information out to millions? It is our only hope…”

Gilbert then announced:

“Because of people like [the veteran] and because almost all levels of the media are suppressing the vital facts about Obama… I’m announcing that my distribution company is planning to send a free copy in the U.S. mail to millions of households… this process has already begun. …We are expanding across all of the United States until every American understands the deadly Marxist dreams Obama has for us, from his real father, Frank Marshall Davis.”

Weather Underground: White Reds Exploiting Blacks

Larry Grathwohl is the only FBI informant to successfully penetrate the Weather Underground (WU). He testified before several federal Grand Juries, the U.S. Senate, and at the Mark Felt/Ed Miller FBI trial. He wrote the 1976 book, Bringing Down America and now works with America’s Survival, Inc. to re-establish Congressional committees to investigate internal security problems. Larry continues to provide insights into this malevolent organization and its most famous members, Obama BFFs, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. At the Kincaid conference he presents his report, White Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Weather Underground, Barack Obama, and the Fundamental Transformation of the United States.

Larry started by relating that FBI background investigations used to apply something called the CARL standard. CARL stands for Character, Associates, Reputation and Loyalty. By that standard, President Obama fails on all counts, but in particular, his associates are damning evidence of an attitude irreconcilably hostile to America, the country he is supposed to be serving as the highest elected official in the land.

Those of us familiar with Bill Ayers know that he authored Prairie Fire, WU’s communist manifesto, and that it was dedicated to people including Bobby Kennedy’s killer, Sirhan Sirhan. Most people are unaware that Ayers was denied a position at

According to Grathwohl, Ayers once said that both Kennedy assassinations were a good thing. In his own words:

I remember one meeting when our Weatherman “collective” brought up the subject of the Kennedy assassinations. At least 20 to 25 people were present and Bill Ayers was one of them. I heard Bill state that the murders of both John F. Kennedy and Robert F Kennedy were a good thing because liberals compromise the conflict between U.S. imperialism and the socialist revolution. Liberals prevent the contradictions from becoming obvious and thus prevent a revolution. Therefore, the assassinations of the Kennedys were to be welcomed as a necessary advance on the road to communist world revolution.

In other words, if someone’s existence messes up the narrative, Ayers says get rid of him! Robert Kennedy’s son, Christopher, who sits on the board of the University of Illinois, saw to it that Ayers was denied “emeritus” status because of this. Kennedy said, “There can be no place in a democracy to celebrate political assassinations or to honor those who do.”

Bill Ayers, just a guy in the neighborhood… Nothing to see here, move along…

Most people are unaware that WU was essentially a project of communist Cuba’s intelligence organ, the DGI. Larry describes Ayers’ WU activities:

• Ayers and Dohrn had numerous contacts with the DGI in both Cuba and Canada. DGI provided advice, logistical, communications, guerilla training and/or financial support.
• This support extended to the May 19th organization that Obama allegedly joined. May 19th was responsible for the Brinks robbery and murders.
• The FBI says an individual working for Soviet Intelligence joined Students for a Democratic Society – WU’s parent organization – as a spotter for recruits. SDS members figure prominently among Obama’s contacts and friends.
• Bernardine Dohrn was egged on by the Cuban and Vietnamese communist agents, who claimed WU weren’t authentic revolutionaries due to their “white-skinned privilege.”
• This bothered them because it was and is true that most “revolutionaries” come from wealthy backgrounds and don’t know a thing about being poor.
• Weatherman doctrine claimed American minorities were a “colonized people” and could therefore legitimately fight a war of liberation, but white leaders were part of U.S. racist imperialism or at least benefited from it.
• Yet, when urged to recruit “authentic” black and Hispanic revolutionaries to the leadership, WU leaders resisted, feeling threatened and inadequate; they feared losing their positions.
• Ayers and Dohrn wrote a book in 2009 titled: “Race Course Against White Supremacy.”
• The publisher’s statement said: “Our work, the work of Ayers and Dohrn… made it possible for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to run for the presidency. And President Obama’s successful campaign started on the streets of Chicago.

Larry concludes that both blacks and Muslim terrorists, whom he says have been allies of the communists as “oppressed people of the Middle East,” are cannon fodder for the Left’s world revolution. “Blacks,” he said, “are not to be liberated, but exploited, even killed, on the road to liberation.”

There was much more. Grathwohl’s report can be read HERE. His presentation can be viewed HERE.

Other conference participants included:

Ryan Mauro is the national security analyst for RadicalIslam.org, the website of the Clarion Fund, the organization that produced the films, “Obsession,” “The Third Jihad” and “Iranium.” An adjunct online professor of terrorism and homeland security, he has a Bachelor’s degree in Intelligence Studies and a Master’s degree in Political Science from American Military University. He is an expert on the dangers posed by the Muslim Brotherhood. At the Conference he aired excerpts from The Third Jihad and took questions.

Mauro discussed the controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin (wife of former Rep. Anthony Weiner), and Walid Shoebat’s evidence that Abedin’s father, mother and brother either belong, or did belong (her father is deceased) to the Muslim Brotherhood. Was this compromising fact considered in her State Department employment?

When Rep. Michelle Bachman raised concerns about this, she was attacked not only by Democrats, but by Senator John McCain, House Speaker Boehner and other prominent Republicans. Rep. Bachman responded with a sixteen page letter to Muslim Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison, one of her harshest critics.

Jeremy Segal blogs at RebelPundit and is a disciple of the late Andrew Breitbart. He produced the video of Rep. Danny K. Davis being honored by the communist newspaper, People’s World, at the Communist Party U.S.A.’s headquarters in Chicago. The award was for a lifetime of “inspiring leadership.” Rep. Davis is an old friend of Barack Obama’s.

Segal is a brave guy who also has documented Occupy antics with his camera. See his full presentation HERE.

This press conference was a cornucopia of information. There was so much more, too much to be adequately described. One could literally write a book about it. A few more items, however, bear repetition here.

• The alleged Wikileaks source, U.S. Army Sergeant Bradley Manning, claims that his information sources include Shin Inouye, an Obama White House official.
• Holder’s Justice Department has blocked efforts to impose the death penalty on Manning.
• Robert Kennedy’s killer, Sirhan Sirhan was a hardcore communist and called the date of Kennedy’s death the beginning of the end for America.
• JFK’s killer, Lee Harvey Oswald, was also a committed communist. He was also a Soviet agent, who was trained in assassination by the KGB.
• Ion Mihai Pacepa, the former Romanian intelligence chief who defected to the U.S. submitted a report for the Kincaid conference which provides proof of Oswald’s KGB connection.
• A recent book by former CIA Case Officer Brian Littel charges that Cuba knew of Kennedy’s assassination plot before it happened and was probably behind it, along with the Soviet Union.

George Soros and the Prison De-Population Movement

On Friday July 20th, James E. Holmes allegedly shot up an Aurora, Colorado movie theater, killing twelve and wounding scores more. Allegations surfaced that Holmes was a member of the Occupy movement and perhaps a participant in violent “Black Bloc” activities. This has not been confirmed and the media has suspiciously gone silent on his past. However, one thing has been confirmed. If Democrat sugar daddy George Soros had his way, guys like Holmes, in fact every violent felon currently behind bars would be set free.

Among the hundreds of extremist leftwing organizations supported by Soros’ ill-gotten gains is Critical Resistance, a group founded by communist cop-killer Angela Davis that advocates throwing the prison doors open because American prisons are tools of white racist capitalists and prisoners are “victims” of our oppressive government. Critical Resistance has advocated:

• Prison strikes.
• Abolishing solitary confinement, which they call “torture.”
• An effort to ban employee criminal background checks, a move now being considered by the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission.
• “Adequate” standard of living and medical care for prisoners.
• Release of domestic terrorist Marilyn Buck, Eric Holder’s Justice Department granted that request and unrepentant convicted murderer Buck is now free.

A related organization is the W. Haywood Burns Institute. Domestic terrorist and Obama friend Bernardine Dohrn sits on its board. Burns was Dohrn’s brother-in-law and a communist lawyer who defended Angela Davis and other radicals. Obama’s Harvard mentor, Derrick Bell, another communist, revered Burns.

The Obama/Holder Justice Department has awarded $400,000 to the Burns Institute. Could this be because Dohrn is on the board or do they support the agenda for its own sake? Where was the mass media?

Ayers and Dohrn – just people in the neighborhood. Nothing to see here; move along…

Cliff Kincaid meanwhile, has written that the entire issue could be settled quickly if Abedin’s security clearance form were produced. I won’t be taking bets anytime soon. More information about Abedin can be found at Americas’ Survival. And see Mauro’s full presentation HERE.

Cliff Kincaid organized this Conference. Cliff has probably done more over the years to report on America’s radical left than any other living person. He is a veteran journalist, author, and media critic, serves as President of America’s Survival, Inc. and director of the Accuracy in Media Center for Investigative Journalism. He released the 600-page FBI file on Barack Obama’s communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, in 2008, and has called on Congress to re-establish committees examining internal security problems in the U.S.

Cliff’s introductory and concluding remarks are a story unto themselves. Watch HERE and HERE.

Copyright Policy © Right Side News : This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

The new conservative film, “Obama’s America: 2016,” offers a lot of good information but muddies the waters as Americans, during this critical election year, look outside the major media for information about their President.

Instead of educating people about the communist influence over Barack Obama, an unprecedented and shocking development for an American president, filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza claims that “anti-colonialism,” a philosophy exploited by communists, is behind his beliefs and policies.

The critical fact about the cause of anti-colonialism, ignored in the film, is that it was a tactic of the international communist movement, which attempted to create the Soviet Union’s own colonial empire.

This omission is strange, since D’Souza’s film touts his work for President Ronald Reagan, who fought the communists in Hollywood and confronted the Soviet “evil empire,” leading to the collapse of the system and the independence of countries formerly under its control.

Oscar-winning producer Gerald R. Molen, who has produced several films for Steven Spielberg, also worked on the D’Souza project and has been quoted as saying that he intended “Obama’s America: 2016” to be an effort to depict the decline of America and its influence under Obama.

If the film performs this function, it will serve a purpose. There are several worthwhile parts of the film, such as an interview with Daniel Pipes, the foreign policy expert who talks mostly about Obama’s pro-Muslim views and policies.

The film is also entertaining and funny, as D’Souza talks about his own family history and background as a conservative journalist. He came from India and has made a major success of his own life.

The film, which is getting a lot of attention from the conservative media, especially Fox News and Glenn Beck, is backed by the powerhouse public relations firm, Shirley & Banister Public Affairs, and was screened in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday night. Many, but not all, of the moviegoers were enthusiastic. D’Souza was not in attendance to be questioned about the film, but others said it has been playing in Houston, Texas and will soon be shown in hundreds of movie theaters nationwide.

The film, which was enormously expensive to produce, shows D’Souza traveling around the world, in such places as Kenya and Indonesia, digging up information about Obama. But the 90-minute film waits until about 30-minutes in to highlight the critical fact about Obama—that he had an eight-year relationship with Communist Party USA operative Frank Marshall Davis. This is covered in the span of only a few minutes as D’Souza interviews Paul Kengor, author of a new book about Davis, THE COMMUNIST Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.

The interview with Kengor is awkward in that they communicate using cell phones. It appears that the segment was dropped in at the last minute to take into account the publication of Kengor’s book, released only this month. The Kengor book should have been prominently featured and addressed, as Kengor is a respected academic and Cold War historian who has documented his book in great detail.

The film shows brief excerpts from the 600-page Frank Marshall Davis FBI file without telling viewers that it was released four years ago by this writer and ignored by the media. A glimpse of a report, “The Frank Marshall Davis FBI File,” was taken right off one of my websites. It is still relevant but four years old, an indication that D’Souza is late to what many believe is the story of the century—how a “revolutionary mole,” in the words of communist activist Frank Chapman, came to occupy the Oval Office.

Indeed, the Davis influence over Obama was ignored by D’Souza’s own book, The Roots of Obama’s Rage, which was published in 2010 and is the basis of the film. D’Souza blamed Obama’s rage on his hatred for colonialism, not his love for Marxism.

In that book, D’Souza devoted only three pages to Davis and he seemed completely unfamiliar with the FBI file. D’Souza wrote, “During the presidential campaign some conservatives highlighted Davis’s Communist ties,” leaving the matter at that and dismissing the documentary research that had already been done.

Having ignored the facts at the time, it appears that D’Souza decided he had to take a new angle—that Obama was motivated by anti-colonialism, or rejection of the influence of Western nations over Third World and other nations.

The film itself shows a film clip of D’Souza appearing on a TV show explaining that he had rejected the label “socialist” for Obama and instead decided to put “a new card on the table”—anti-colonialism as a theory that explains everything Obama is thinking and doing.

Yet, as D’Souza notes in his film, Obama discusses anti-colonialism in his book, Dreams from My Father, and makes clear his sympathy with it. Obama even talks about Marxist friends. The cover-up that Obama engineered at the time was not about anti-colonialism or even having Marxist associates but the influence of Davis, identified only as “Frank” in the book. Davis was a card-carrying member of a political party controlled and funded by Moscow. This was doubly sensitive because the FBI suspected that Davis may have been engaged in espionage activities in Hawaii. Obama had to know that Davis had been called before Congress to explain his “Soviet activities.”

Although the film has some important information near the end about Obama’s deals with the Russians, involving the dramatic reduction in the U.S. nuclear arsenal and Obama’s promise of more concessions if he is re-elected, the question of whether Obama could be under Russian influence is not addressed. Yet, because Obama was never “vetted” by the media and did not undergo an FBI background check, there is no way to know for sure.

Despite the watered-down nature of the film’s charges against Obama, The New York Times attacked one of its investors, Joe Ricketts, who is alarmed by Obama’s agenda and wants the truth to get out.

D’Souza was one of many conservatives unwilling to take seriously the matter of Obama’s ideology in 2008, admitting that he wasn’t a member of “the conservative chorus” raising questions about Obama during the presidential campaign.

However, four years later, instead of examining in an in-depth manner the communist influence of Davis, the D’Souza film claims that Obama’s “absentee father,” Barack Hussein Obama of Kenya, was the decisive influence over the President. In fact, however, new research done by filmmaker Joel Gilbert makes the case that the Kenyan wasn’t even the real father. Gilbert’s film, “Dreams from My Real Father,” has been ignored by Fox News and Glenn Beck, despite extensive research into the backgrounds of Obama and his mother’s intimate relationship with Davis. The Gilbert thesis is bolstered by the work of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, an avowed enemy of the Obama administration who has discovered that Obama’s birth certificate was tampered with in order to conceal the identity of the real father.

By his own admission, Obama didn’t know much about the Kenyan, even though he used him as a prop during the 2008 campaign, when he ran as the son of the “goat herder from Kenya.” This claim, however, was also false, since the Kenyan was a well-educated socialist bureaucrat (but not an identified communist).

“Why has the media avoided reporting on the connection between Obama and Davis?” D’Souza asks in the film.

It is a good question—one that we were consistently asking, beginning in 2008, after we published the column, “Obama’s Communist Mentor,” on February 18 of that year. This particular column noted that the identification of “Frank,” a character in Obama’s book Dreams from My Father, was originally made by New Zealand blogger Trevor Loudon in 2007.

Kengor says the media do not want to write about Davis’s communist background because they fear being labeled as McCarthyites, a reference to the controversial senator who made highly-publicized allegations of high-level communist infiltration of the U.S. Government.

Significantly, D’Souza doesn’t credit Trevor Loudon, who has his own patriotic reasons for alerting the American people to the foreign influence over Obama, for his research into the “Frank” controversy. It is a shame that D’Souza, the president of The King’s College, a Christian institution in New York City, didn’t want to credit others for the truly groundbreaking and still valid research that was done four years ago.

The influence of Davis explains why Obama arrived at Occidental College as a committed Marxist at the age of 18. But D’Souza gets seriously off track by offering the theory that Obama became a committed “anti-colonialist” after visiting the grave of his Kenyan “father” years later.

Another major flaw in the film is the claim, offered during a discussion of the influence of Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright, that liberation theology is “the religious wing of anti-colonialism,” rather than an expression of Marxism. The film also identifies terrorist Bill Ayers as one of Obama’s “founding fathers,” without noting that Ayers and his Weather Underground comrades were self-admitted communists who made trips to Cuba and North Vietnam and had contact with the Soviet and Cuban intelligence services.

The film’s constant focus on “anti-colonialism” confuses matters and could even lead to some sympathy for the Obama worldview. After all, he argues that Western nations do not have clean hands in their dealings with the Third World.

D’Souza interviews George Obama, identified as Barack Obama’s half-brother. This is the really new part of the film that has gotten most of the media attention. Whether he is truly related to Obama or not, George Obama says that countries like Kenya would be better off economically with more, not less, Western influence.

D’Souza jokes that America elected the wrong Obama as president. But it is not a laughing matter to the conservatives who tried to sound the alarm about Obama before the election that put him in power and who now believe that the alleged Kenyan father and Obama’s “anti-colonialism” are more diversions from the shocking truth.

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.

Arizona’s Joe Arpaio, known as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” for his treatment of criminals, has been sued by the Obama Administration but is running for re-election this year. He may already have had the last laugh, as his investigators probing President Obama’s birth certificate have come up with sure-fire proof that the document has been tampered with. The evidence shows that the identification of Obama’s father as “African” was not on the original document.

Arpaio says the tampering may represent a “national security threat,” a reference to the fact that, if Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent, foreigners seeking entry into or citizenship in the United States could similarly obtain phony documents. He is asking Congress to investigate.

The reason for the cover-up in Obama’s case, contends filmmaker Joel Gilbert, is that his real father was Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist under FBI surveillance who was Obama’s mentor while he was growing up in Hawaii. The Gilbert film, “Dreams from My Real Father,” makes this case, based on a series of striking photo comparisons between Obama and Davis, and informed speculation that Davis, a sex “swinger” and pornographer, had an intimate affair with Obama’s mother. The film includes nude photos that Davis took of her in Davis’s home.

Joseph Farah’s WorldNetDaily, which has been working with and covering the Arpaio inquiry, now seems focused on the critical issue of not where Obama was born but whether the identity of the father has been concealed. Gilbert argues that the “birthers” were on the wrong track all along and that the work of Arpaio’s team “confirms both the evidence and thesis” presented in his film that the father was left as “unknown” on Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

Davis, perhaps the central figure in Obama’s early life, was referred to merely as “Frank” in Obama’s book Dreams from My Father. That cover-up was blown four years ago, when the identity of “Frank” was revealed and his 600-page FBI file was disclosed. Still, such figures as Dana Milbank of The Washington Post continue to refer to Davis as just a non-controversial “author.” Like many in the liberal media, Milbank has been determined to sanitize Obama’s relations with a Communist Party USA operative who was called before Congress to explain his involvement in “Soviet activities” in Hawaii.

These pro-Obama “journalists” understand that while the threat of communism does not pack the same kind of punch it did years ago, it would be extremely damaging for Obama to have it known that he was raised and trained by a Communist operative with loyalties to the old Soviet Union. Indeed, Obama’s loyalty to the U.S. might be questioned as a result.

Despite the failure to explain Davis’s Communist background and strong influence over Obama in his youth, the new Obama biography by David Maraniss, Barack Obama, the Story, confirms an Obama poem about “Pop” was about Davis, not the Kenyan or Obama’s grandfather. The poem talks about Davis and whiskey, and stains and smells on their “shorts.”

Without setting out to ascertain true paternity, Arpaio investigator Mike Zullo’s analysis takes the problem to a deeper level—the mentor may have been the actual father. He analyzed the numbers or codes on certain parts of Obama’s so-called “long-form birth certificate,” as released by the White House.

While most media, including conservative talk radio, have shied away from the blockbuster revelations, Zullo appeared on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio to talk about the “faded set of puzzling, handwritten codes,” saying that “…they looked like pencil markings to us. Nobody really knew what they were.” Zullo told Klein they were able track down the “local registrar” who signed the document, a now 95-year-old woman named Verna Lee, who explained what the codes meant.

As noted by WorldNetDaily, Lee confirmed to investigators that the “9” meant the information is not stated, meaning there should not have been any information in the box in which the number is written and that it was left “unknown.” On the “official” document released by the White House, however, the “9” was next to “Race of Father,” under which “African,” a reference to Barack Hussein Obama, the “Kenyan goat herder” claimed by Obama as his father when he ran for office, was entered.

What all of this means is that the word “African” was inserted by persons unknown who apparently wanted the identity of the true father concealed.

The reason for the fraud is what takes the scandal to another more dangerous level. The evidence suggests that Obama’s birth document was altered not just to conceal a family scandal but to conceal Obama’s relationship with a Communist who was considered by the FBI to be a top Soviet operative in the state of Hawaii and eligible for arrest in the case of a national emergency.

But the alteration of the document did not go far enough. The “9” was left on by the forgers because they did not understand what it meant or whether it was relevant. They had to have figured that the “9” would have been ignored as mere scribbling on a birth certificate, having nothing to do with the “African” designation for the father.

This omission on their part has now come back to haunt them and constitutes proof, as noted by Arpaio and his investigators, that the document has been altered. But by whom? The culprits would have to include Obama and/or his top associates.

Not surprisingly, the media either ignored the revelation or distorted its significance. The Associated Press wire service covered the Arpaio news conference and noted, “The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio’s allegations.” But the story went on to question the claims of the “birthers” without saying that the critical issue has now become the identity of the father.

Gilbert was the first to assemble evidence that the “African,” Barack Hussein Obama, was not Obama’s real father, and to offer a coherent explanation as to why the cover-up occurred.

Once it was decided that Davis could not be listed as the father, after the birth, the Kenyan Obama, who had a wife and children in Kenya, agreed to a “sham marriage” in exchange for certain benefits, Gilbert says.

He explains, “The Kenyan Obama applied only to extend his visa and for a work permit, instead of citizenship which he would have done if it were a real marriage and if the child was his. Frank Marshall Davis, a married man with five children, wanted the paternity covered up, while ‘Gramps,’ Stanley Dunham, needed a cover (Davis being under FBI surveillance) due to his government employment. Stanley Dunham knew the Kenyan Obama from his work with Operation Airlift Africa, as evidenced in the photo in the film. No father was named on Barack Obama’s birth certificate because it was not acceptable for Davis to be named as the father, while the Kenyan was not accepting responsibility for the child, only to assist in the cover up for short term benefit.”

Gilbert tells AIM that, in addition to all of this, “I corresponded and spoke several times with an elderly friend of Frank Marshall Davis named Stephen T. Murin, who was 93 years old. When I asked him about the Obama birth certificate, he told me, ‘as far as I know they didn’t put any father on it.’ Unfortunately, Murin passed away suddenly and I never got a chance to interview him on camera.”

“Barack Obama built his political career on the goat herding Kenyan father, by which he meant that he would bring people together and was above politics. So the story went,” Gilbert said. “In fact, it is more likely Obama has a deeply disturbing family background, from which he acquired a Marxist political foundation. Frank Marshall Davis was a member of CPUSA, and a Communist propagandist and organizer, charged with bringing black people into the movement. Some CPUSA members became Soviet spies, stealing America’s atomic weapons plans and helping to ignite the Cold War. Davis was suspected of espionage in the FBI files.”

Gilbert concluded, “While voters will overlook some fudging by politicians, promoting a false family background to hide a Marxist agenda irreconcilable with American values is a totally unacceptable manipulation of the electorate.”

As Gilbert makes his case to the media, he finds resistance, even from conservative media organizations such as Newsmax.com. “On May 2 of this year, I paid Newsmax $4,350, in advance, for an advertising campaign,” he said at my Washington conference last week. “They pulled it at the last second. ‘Why?’ They said it was because they wanted ‘to move to the Center.’”

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.

The long sought Supreme Court verdict on Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution has just been announced. Eligibility activists have finally forced the SCOTUS to tell us how U.S. Presidents are  to be elected. Experts declare this a landmark ruling. Never before have the words in Article 2 ever been defined – not even to their authors.

John Roberts and Barack Obama attempting the “Mirror Routine” popularized by Charlie Chaplin, Harpo Marx, and Lucille Ball dressed as Harpo because at that time women could not vote by act of comedy

The Supremes voted 1-8, with Justice John Roberts again casting the lone, deciding vote. America’s Got Electoral Talent! – it is.

According to Roberts’ interpretation of the Constitution, on or before Tuesday, November 6, America’s voters must each sing along with his personal-favorite folk/rock oldie, “Reason to Believe.” Then, they must email their PC-recorded renditions to America’s Got Electoral Talent! – a replacement for the Electoral College – where they will be digitally combined, or “mixed,” one version for Barack Obama, the putative president, and the other for Mitt Romney, the long presumptuous GOP nominee.

Roberts determined each eligible after a wild all-nigher with both candidates and their Secret Service contingents, pronouncing in his decision, “It is not the duty of the Supreme Court to protect people from the consequences of their parties.”

Researchers indicate this will be the world’s first Mass-Karaoke Sing-off Election, performed as serenades to one’s chosen candidate.

Democrats have immediately chosen to sing the famous Rod Stewart version to Obama, in keeping with the overall theme of a world-popular, non-citizen arrangement:

Republicans’ rendition to Romney will be sung based upon a recording by the song’s composer, Tim Hardin, this selection, as GOP spokespersons explained, meant to signify heart felt lip service to the doctrine of original intent:

Justice Roberts explained in his decision that while the Constitution is clearly too outdated to be understood by 21st Century sensibilities, the actual rules for presidential elections were spelled out in an only recently discovered cross-referencing of page 1,386, page 329, page 522, page 1,923, and and page 9, of the 2010 Affordable Healthcare Act (officially and alternatively called the Affordable Care Act, the Affordable Healthcare for America Act, or RombamaCare) — plus some notes of then Speaker Nancy Pelosi, hand-written after the bill was passed and stapled onto the second to last page, which explained the whole thing.

After America’s Got Electoral Talent! makes their determination, it will be certified for the first time, not by Congress, but by, if we can read Pelosi’s scrawlings correctly… “the 15-Member Constitutional Death Panel.”

For further reading and to get into the spirit of the song, we recommend the following Web searches:

www.google.com/search?q=Barack+Obama+lies+of+list

www.google.com/search?q=Mitt+Romney+lies+of+list

Singers must remain seated during their performances, as an acknowledgment of having no standing concerning the eligibility, nor indeed, the overall selection of their presidents. They may also be groped, but must be Webcammed during the song, to verify their seated status; citizenship not required; only one singing ballot recommended per person, to guard against Post-Traumatic Election Disability (PTED) among voters; any new computer equipment obtained for these purposes may be purchased only with ICLEI-approved, triple-bottom-line financing according to United Nations Rio +20 non-binding mandates.

Lyrics are as follows, for purposes of rehearsal.

If I listened long enough to you
I’d find a way to believe that it’s all true
Knowing that you lied straight faced while I cried
Still I look to find a reason to believe

Someone like you makes it hard to live
Without somebody else
Someone like you makes it easy to give*
Never thinking of myself

If I gave you time to change my mind
I’d find a way to leave the past behind
Knowing that you lied straight faced while I cried**
Still I look to find a reason to believe

Someone like you makes it hard to live
Without somebody else
Someone like you makes it easy to give
Never thinking of myself

If I gave you time to change my mind
I’d find a way to leave the past behind
Knowing that you lied straight faced while I cried
Still I look to find a reason to believe
Still I look to find a reason to believe
Still I look to find a reason to believe

___________________________________________________

* All oral ballots replacing this line’s ending with “to be taxed,”
or “to be mandated” will be disqualified.

** Please try not to actually cry, as this may affect the quality
of the overall orchestration of the presidency.

Obama practicing his self-serenade

Romney leading choir practice for both of his devotees

From The Western Center for Journalism:

Outrageous: Judge Decides Law Doesn’t Apply To Obama

July 5, 2012 By Doug Book

A Circuit Court has decided that Florida election law applies to everyone but Barack Hussein Obama. In response to a suit brought by Florida resident and Democrat Party member Michael Voeltz challenging Obama’s eligibility to the Florida ballot, Circuit Court Judge Terry Lewis ruled that Florida election law “…is not applicable to the nomination of a candidate for Office of President of the United States.” This means that the Florida Statute which says, “the… nomination of any person to office…may be contested in the circuit court…by any elector or any taxpayer…” is null and void when it comes to Mr. Obama’s nomination to the presidency.

“If the plaintiff was challenging the candidate’s eligibility for any other office, his analysis would be correct and [the law] would apply,” said Lewis of Voeltz’s suit. However, according to the Judge, “…Political parties determine their [presidential] nominee at a national convention pursuant to rules that the parties draft and approve…” In short, Mr. Voeltz’s contest of Barack Obama’s eligibility will NEVER be permitted in a Florida court; for voters do not nominate the president, political parties do in balloon filled convention halls! With this ruling, Lewis has spared Barack Obama the necessity of having to prove his eligibility for office as no Florida voter will have the right to question it, the language of the state’s election law notwithstanding!

continues, including the reaction of Larry Klayman, attorney of Voeltz

Answer: When it’s available for parties.

But clearly it goes beyond that, to what I’ve called the Global Mammon Complex (GMC) which has both captured the ass and trained the elephant. And don’t think it hasn’t also brought the United States “Intelligence Community” in tow, as well as the three branches overall, and the fourth estate.

Alternative answer: by 2012 AD.

There are numerous good sites for text and video on this abomination, of course I mean case, including WND.com, CDR Kerchner’s Blog, and Florida resident Sam Sewell’s The Steady Drip.  Klayman indicates an appeal is forthwith.

And so, how’s that popular sovereignty working out for us?

And for further reading on the GMC, our tag, http://gulagbound.com/tag/carroll-quigley

h/t @OhSuzyQz

“He’s CIA.” (Slap!)

“I said I want the truth!”

“He’s Communist.” (Slap!)  “He’s CIA.” (Slap!)  “He’s Communist, he’s CIA.” (Slap! Cry of pain. Slap!)

“I said I want the truth!” (Crash.)

(Cry of pain.)  “HE’S COMMUNIST AND CIA!”  (Weeping.)

I have tended to let others do the Obamology, especially since letting my blog, Investigating Obama fly mostly on autopilot, after taking on the publishing of this Gulag Bound Webzine. But along with his obvious Marxism, the hypothesis that Obama has been protected by,  has even worked with and for United States intelligence, has also played on my mind since the beginnings of his putatively presidential term.

The incestuous liaisons, of various entities and individuals of American intelligence agencies, with leftist, statist, and globalist politicians, and corrupt anti-American financiers and foundations – also their adulterous relations with the United Nations, transnational NGO’s, corrupt transnational corporations, and foreign intelligence apparatuses (including but not limited to the KGB) – have been documented in numerous places, some of it in Gulag Bound. Books have been written and more could be added.

The following two videos came under my nose in close succession yesterday. I think it is high time their messages be put together.

Dear Cliff and Trevor,

I know you have been skeptical of Wayne Madsen and his research, in large part due to his own leftist family history.

I think it would be good to look more carefully into this and it is likely you will find Wayne Madsen more right than wrong about Barack Obama and the CIA. There has been simply too much protecting, scrubbing, and falsifying of records going on and it began in earnest well before his presidency. There are also too many close associations, for this to be dismissed.

Add to this, the signature of the massive pressure put upon the U.S. news media, not to publish the problematic facts and mysteries of Obama’s identity and development, but to instead, where put on the spot, ridicule efforts to expose them.

As you know, U.S. intelligence has been a battleground of patriots vs. globalist, Jacobin statists, from at least the days of Wilson. Operation Paperclip hardly helped, nor the subsuming work of the Department of Homeland Security (“Homeland” as distinct from “National”). And now we have Global Governance 2025, to show who has been winning that hushed warfare within our own intelligence “services.”

We understand the eagerness and ambition of Alex Jones and some of the leanings of Madsen, but you may want to take another look, beginning with this interview. It is presented in three YouTube segments; please be patient to get past the first.

Respectfully yours,
Arlen

As for the video I happened to notice just after the above, consider something else many have known: that not only has Barack Obama been presented us for the U.S. Presidency, but at least two other heavily Communist-tainted candidates before him, John Kerry and Bill Clinton.

Where do we go now?

Note:

We do not endorse all the conclusions or statements of either Madsen or Jones, nor all the behavior of Beck.

Exclusive Video: Republican Congressman “Supports Obama” Regarding His Eligibility

April 5, 2012 By Daniel Noe

[GBound: Video, "Congressman Asked About Investigation Into Obama's Forgeries"]
Cameraman: Gabe Zolna

Western Journalism contributor Tom Ballantyne Jr., author of “Oh Really, O’Reilly?“, went to a meeting of the Red Mountain Tea Party in Arizona on Tuesday, April 3, 2012. Although cameras were not allowed into the meeting, Tom was able to sneak in a recording device. In the video Ballantyne asks Arizona Republican Congressman (and Senate hopeful) Jeff Flake about his views on ForgeryGate, the controversy revolving around Barack Obama’s forged birth certificate and selective service card that the mainstream media on both sides seeks to hide. The results aren’t pretty…

Our congressmen don’t want to hold Obama accountable, but fortunately, these congressmen are accountable to we the people. Make sure you remember this on election day this November.

Watch the presentation that Sheriff Joe Arpaio gave on March 31st about his investigation into the forgeries by clicking here. Stay informed and share with your friends.

We would encourage you to watch the entire video and then share it with your friends via Facebook, Twitter, e-mail, and other social networks.

Click here to purchase Tom Ballantyne Jr.’s book Oh Really, O’Reilly, about the issue of Obama’s eligibility.

U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, official 112th Congressional photo

Lawrence Sellin

by Lawrence Sellin
The Post & Email

Our vote is the only leverage we have left

No American should vote for any Presidential candidate, who will not adhere to the Presidential oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.

Barack Hussein Obama has not done so from the moment he raised his right hand, placed his left on the Bible and swore that oath on January 20, 2009.

Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution requires that all candidates for President and Vice President be a “natural born citizen.”

The binding Supreme Court precedent Minor vs. Happersett (1874), which has never been superseded, defines “natural born” as a U.S. born citizen of citizen parents at the time of birth; that is, a second generation American.

Obama is not a natural born citizen and has never been eligible for the Presidency.

In addition, on March 1, 2012, Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio presented evidence that Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011 and his Selective Service registration are forgeries.

Add to that other evidence, which indicates that Obama is using a Social Security Number not issued to him.

Many believe that the Democrats and the mainstream media are totally united behind Obama, are impenetrable to logic or demands for governmental accountability and will use any means necessary to ensure his reelection.

Yet the Republicans, either through fear or complicity, refuse to challenge the obvious inconsistencies in Obama’s personal history, which remain their most potent argument to defeat him.

In Obama’s own words, the Republicans are bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Perhaps it is time for Republicans show some guts, stop running away from a fight and, in fact, “stoop to their level,” because all Obama’s opponents will be labeled “racists” or “extremists” no matter what is said or done.

If the Republicans will not “man up,” then ordinary Americans must encourage them to do so.

All avenues for the redress of our grievances; Congress, the courts, law enforcement and the press, have been intentionally cut off from us in a conspiracy of silence.

Our vote is the only leverage we have left.

The best thing everyone can do now is to contact your local Republican Party and tell them that you will not vote for any Republican candidate until they fully vet Obama before the election. And then tell as many other people as possible to do the same.

Copy and paste the above paragraph and send it to your family and friends.

Spread the word. Working together, we can make a difference.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Afghanistan and the Culture of Military Leadership” and “Political Establishments and the Culture of Dependency”. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

WND EXCLUSIVE

Hollywood producer heard Bill Clinton say Obama ineligible

Insider in Hillary’s 2008 campaign points to ‘original birthers’

 

A successful Hollywood producer who had an insider’s view of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign claims she heard Bill Clinton say that Barack Obama is not eligible to be president.

Bettina Viviano – who started her own film production company in 1990 after serving as vice president of production for Steven Spielberg’s Amblin Entertainment – told WND that it was common knowledge among delegates committed to Hillary that the Clintons believed Obama was constitutionally ineligible and that Bill Clinton would eventually disclose his belief to the public.

The Clintons were the original “birthers,” Viviano told WND in an interview in Los Angeles.

continues

For further reading and hearing from Bettina Viviano on this tragic matter, we suggest PolitiJim’s “Did Obama Assassinate Clinton Delegates?“ March 20, 2012.

And from Andrea Shea King, today:

Join us tonight to hear Bettina tell us in her own words what she knows…
9PM ET
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2012/04/03/the-andrea-shea-king-show

Now we excerpt the beginning of Jerome Corsi’s, WND article on Hulton and show the attached video:

WND EXCLUSIVE

Postman: Ayers family put ‘foreigner’ Obama through school

Claims he met young Barack who boasted he’d someday be president
Monday, March 19

Allen Hulton, WND photo

CHICAGO – Did the parents of former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers help finance Barack Obama’s Harvard education?

Did Ayers’ mother believe Obama was a foreign student?

And was the young Obama convinced at the time – long before he even entered politics – that he was going to become president of the United States?

A retired U.S. Postal Service carrier who delivered mail to Tom and Mary Ayers in a Chicago suburb in the late 1980s and early 1990s and claims to have met Obama in front of the Ayers home emphatically says yes to all three questions.

continues

American Thinker
March 19, 2012

A few days ago I got a call asking whether I knew anything about the Ayers family mailman. I had heard of him, I said. I remembered liberal blogger Steven Diamond having interviewed the fellow a few years back but paid it little mind as the information seemed too limited to pursue.

The caller then sent me a video interview with the mailman by WND sleuth Jerome Corsi. The video made me sit up and pay attention. The mailman is a real person. His name is Alan Hulton. He seems entirely credible, and he has a story to tell.

Hulton delivered mail in Glen Ellyn, Illinois, from 1962 to 2001 with a couple years off to serve in the military. During roughly ten of those years he delivered mail to the home of Tom and Mary Ayers, Bill Ayers’s parents. Hulton talked to Tom once, Mary several times, their daughter-in-law Bernardine Dohrn a few times, and Bill Ayers not at all. Memorably, he talked once to one of their visitors, but more on that in a moment.

As Hulton tells Corsi—and he has sworn an affidavit to the same—he met Tom Ayers not long after the Ayers moved to the neighborhood. Until he retired in 1980 at the age of 65, Tom Ayers was the CEO and chairman of Commonwealth Edison. Tom, however, was not your garden-variety plutocrat. According to Diamond, who knows his way around Chicago politics, he was a “lifelong liberal,” one who was deeply involved in the same educational reform movement that engaged son Bill and, briefly, Barack Obama in 1988. Tom Ayers was comfortable enough with Bill’s lifestyle to live with him in Hyde Park until he died in 2007.

Thomas Ayers

When Hulton met Tom Ayers they talked about working conditions at the Post Office. “I couldn’t believe how he responded,” Hulton told Diamond. “He started to talk about workers having to struggle to survive and about peasants and the proletariat. It made me think later that he might be a Marxist!” Hulton would tell Corsi, “I had this uncomfortable feeling that he thought he knew about my situation as a working person better than I did, that he knew what was best for me.”

Hulton also recalls one particular conversation with Mary Ayers. “She was enthusiastically talking to me about this young black student that they were helping out,” he tells Corsi, “and she referred to him as a foreign student.” Adds Hulton, “I was taken back by how enthusiastic she was about him.” Within a year of this conversation, Hulton had a fateful meeting with the young man he presumed Mary was talking about it.

According to Hulton, he encountered the fellow on the sidewalk on the front of the Ayers home. In that it was extremely rare to see a black man in this tony neighborhood, Hulton believes the man felt the need to explain his visit to the Ayers household. Hulton describes him as friendly and neatly, although casually, dressed. Hulton tells Corsi, “I am absolutely positive that it was Barack Obama.”

Hulton was sympathetic. After he had come out of military service, he was a supporter of Martin Luther King, who had pressed for fair housing in the Chicago area in the 1960s. “I took some flak about my support for civil rights from my fellow workers at the time,” remembers Hulton.

Obama explained to Hulton that he had taken the train out from Chicago to Glen Ellyn in order “to thank the Ayers family personally for helping him with his education.” What shocked Hulton was that when casually inquiring into the young man’s plans for the future, Obama answered, “I am going to be president of the United States.” As Hulton tells Corsi, “It came across like this was something that’s already been determined.” Adds Hulton, “I was speechless.”

Hulton told Diamond and Corsi essentially the same story. What gives the Corsi interview added value is that we see Hulton tell it. Although just a year older than Bill Ayers, he seems to come from a different generation. He has little to gain—and a lot to risk—by going public. Corsi warns Hulton that by quoting Mary’s comment that Obama was a “foreign student,” he put himself at some risk. Says Hulton, “I am only telling you what I distinctly remember her saying—that he was a foreign student.”

Hulton’s interviews with Diamond and Corsi are consistent in every major detail save for dates. Hulton suggested to Diamond that the sidewalk meeting took place in the mid-80s, but Corsi suggests to Hulton that it was in the early 1990s, and Hulton does not correct him. Hulton clearly does not remember the date. If I were to speculate, I would guess 1988, the year Obama started Harvard Law School. Presuming Hulton actually met Obama, the “education” in question would almost surely had to have been law school.

There is a good deal at stake here. According to Snopes and the other fact check sites, Bill Ayers and Obama did not meet until the mid-1990s. This is a talking point that both Ayers and Obama have upheld. When Ayers appeared on ABC’s Good Morning America in 2008, he put the date of their first meeting in 1995 at a fundraiser in Ayers’s own home. “I think he was probably in 20 homes that day as far as I know,” said Ayers. “But that was the first time I really met him.”

As it happens, I stumbled into my own discovery of Ayers’s involvement in the writing of Obama’s 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father, when I was investigating how Obama got into Harvard Law School and who paid his way. What had piqued my interest was an interview with veteran New York power broker Percy Sutton on a local New York City show called “Inside City Hall.” The interview took place in late March 2008 but did not surface until August 2008.

Sutton told how twenty years prior he had been “introduced to [Obama] by a friend.” The friend’s name was Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, “the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men.” The billionaire in question was Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal. According to Sutton, al-Mansour had asked him to “please write a letter in support of [Obama] … a young man that has applied to Harvard.” Sutton had friends at Harvard and gladly did so.

A few months before the election it should have mattered that a respected black political figure like Sutton had publicly announced that a fanatic black separatist, backed by an ambitious Saudi billionaire, had been guiding Obama’s career perhaps for the last twenty years. It did to the Obama-friendly media, but not in a way it would have to real journalists. Moving in swiftly to kill the story were Politico, an insider DC journal run by Washington Post alums, and Media Matters for America, an alleged watchdog group founded by the recovering Troopergate author, David Brock.

Ben Smith of Politico took the lead. Shortly after the story broke, Smith ran the disclaimer that “Barack Obama’s campaign is flatly denying a story told by former Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton.” After some conspicuous waffling, al Mansour denied the story as well. A self-appointed “spokesman for Sutton’s family” by the name of Kevin Wardally sent an email to Smith that read in part: “As best as our family and the Chairman’s closest friends can tell, Mr. Sutton, now 86 years of age, misspoke in describing certain details and events in that television interview.”

For Smith, even though Wardally had gotten Sutton’s age wrong by two years, this email was proof enough that Sutton’s highly specific claim was manufactured. Wrote Smith, Wardally’s email “seems to put the story to rest for good.” Media Matters meanwhile scolded those conservative bloggers that did not accept the various denials at face value.

Like the man about to be carted away in Monty Python’s Holy Grail, the Percy Sutton story was not quite dead yet. Sutton’s son and daughter told conservative reporter, Ken Timmerman, that no one in their family even knew who Kevin Wardally was, let alone authorized him to speak on behalf of the family. “I’m getting better,” pled Monty Python’s nearly dead man. No he wasn’t. Nor was this story. With Hillary out of the race, no newsroom in America felt compelled to dig up dirt that could sully Obama.

About that time, I found a diary entry that caught my attention. Radical-turned-actor Peter Coyote entered it at the time of the 1996 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Coyote wrote, “I inform Martha that I’m dragging her to the apartment of old friends, ex-Weathermen, Bernadine (sic) Dohrn and Bill Ayers, hosting a party for Senator Leahy. Perhaps Edward Said will be there.”

Said had taught Obama at least one class at Columbia. I had earlier seen a photo taken during an Arab-American community dinner in Chicago in 1998 on the fiftieth anniversary of the Palestinian nakba, or disaster. The photo shows Obama sitting next to Said, seemingly engaged in an animated conversation at dinner. The intimacy surprised me. At the time of the photo, Obama was an obscure state senator while Said, according to the Nation, was “probably the best-known intellectual in the world” and star of that evening’s show. He would speak on this occasion, as the Los Angeles Times would later report, “against settlements, against Israeli apartheid.”

All of this got me to wondering whether an Ayers-Obama-Said-al Mansour cabal had formed in the early 1980s back in New York City. If so, such a combine might have generated enough momentum to push Obama’s career along. To see if Obama and Ayers had crossed paths before Chicago, I ordered a copy of Bill Ayers’ 2001 memoir, Fugitive Days. It was then that I began to realize the depth of Ayers’s involvement in Obama’s rise to power.

Obama would have needed help to get into Harvard. Friendly biographer David Remnick tells us that Obama was an “unspectacular” student in his two years at Columbia and at every stop before that going back to grade school. A Northwestern University professor, John L. McKnight, although a friend of Obama’s and a fellow Alinskyite, reinforces the point, telling Remnick, “I don’t think [Obama] did too well in college.” As to Obama’s LSAT scores, Jimmy Hoffa’s body will be unearthed before those are.

How such an indifferent student got into a law school whose applicants’ LSAT scores typically track between 98 to 99 percentile and whose GPAs range between 3.80 and 4.00 is a subject the media have chosen not to explore. Nor have they asked how Obama paid for that education. Maybe, it is time they ask the mailman.

Jack Cashill is the author of numerous books which reveal important facts about the powerful and their sometimes clandestine power moves. Deconstructing Obama is among his latest.

He is also an independent writer and Emmy winning producer, and has written for Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Weekly Standard, American Thinker, also regularly for WorldNetDaily. Jack may be contacted at Cashill.com.

Gulag Notice: Come back in a bit for more on this.