Worth a thousand words
Worth voting elsewhere on the ballot
If the coincidences are difficult to understand, just click the categories and tags, perhaps starting with category: “Banksters” and tag: “Mitt Romney.”
h/t: Christians Against the New World Order
Subscribe to The Globe
& Malevolence daily email to get the
latest from Noisy Room, Maggie's Notebook, New
Zeal, KeyWiki, and
Gulag Bound each day.






Tell me, exactly where do you get your list of contributers? I can research them much better if you tell me.
Apparently you’re so stupid you can’t read the URL posted beneath the Contributors List.
Oh nevermind, I didn’t realize you were a Gingrich supporter. Should have known though.
The concept by this list is a crock. It says “no significant difference.” Gee, only 5 out of the 20 contributed to both parties. Seems significant enough to debunk this ridiculous post. It’s actually quite common for large contributors to donate to both Democrat and Republican parties, just to make sure who ever wins recognizes the donation if elected. This has been going on since time immemorial. If you want to make a case that’s worth reading, find out WHY they are contributing, and how have they contributed in the past, not just for this election.
It’s even more stupid than that. This is a total of the donations from PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THOSE COMPANIES. Oh, the horror! EMPLOYEES of big banks gave Romney 15 cents or so for every dollar OTHER EMPLOYEES gave to Obama.
I expect people on the left to deceive like this, but it’s even more annoying when people on the right do it.
-Mercy
The telling feature not addressed in the comparison is one of magnitude. Look at the huge bribes given to Obama and token amounts given to Romney to get the big picture of “pay to play.”
Note also, the makeup of contributors who joined for the Harvard and Stanford totals; made up of social engineering professors who promote Marxism and governmental autocracy.