Sometime in May 2011, the United States Constitution was rendered null and void by then “President” Barack Hussein Obama. Although it was later accepted that Mr. Obama was ineligible to be President of the United States, due to his not meeting the US Constitution’s requirement of “natural born citizen,” (and some speculated this was the primary reason he had to destroy the former USA’s original requisite legal document) he, nevertheless, threatened war against a sovereign US State.
With the vernacular of the times, Mr. Obama illegally threatened the then-sovereign State of Texas with the US government’s establishment of a “No Fly Zone” (a term previously used by the US government to enact wars against enemy countries) over Texas if the State leaders and its population refused to go along with illegal sexual groping intimidation techniques delivered by a US government entity misnamed as the “Transportation Safety Agency.”
As this illegal act by the Obama regime (also see “Obama Syndicate”) was never met by any real or lasting resistance from US Congressional leaders or the old Marxist-Leninist court system, the US Constitution was effectively rendered null and void and the United States of America–along with the world–entered into what has come to be known as the “Second Dark Age” of mankind. The legislators and bulk of the US population’s inattention to this criminal act and others regarding both the country’s dissolution of additional liberties and individual economic wealth are said to be the principal reasons the USA was toppled–from within–as a world power. This is believed to have been the beginning of the rise of humanity’s forceful suppression and enslavement worldwide.
With the current lack of any truthful reporting by the Obama-run media and lack of attention from a preponderance of US citizens, the above may very well be what is written at some point in the future. Obama has already eliminated many of the protections of the US Constitution via either executive fiat or policies. Although this is illegal, remember that as long as he’s allowed to get away with it, it’s as if the law dos not exist.
Test cases designed to lead towards and finally effect the end of the US Constitution–and the USA–by usurper and Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama have been prevalent. Now-former LTC Terence Lakin was court-martialed–after his kangaroo-court styled military “trial”–and placed in Leavenworth prison for questioning the tyrant’s authority to command. He was recently released. Note: Remember that this was before The Obama’s minions produced the now-exposed-as-fraud “long-form birth certificate.”
Obama’s DOJ has ruled that voter suppression by the New Black Panthers and others against white people and non-Obama supporters will be tolerated and accepted. Criminal convictions against perpetrators of electorate suppression will be overturned. Senior Obama political appointee Julie Fernandes instructed DOJ attorneys that “cases are not going to be brought against black defendants (for) the benefit of white victims” and that the “Civil Rights Division wasn’t going to be bringing them.”
This is illegal and flies in the face of everything this country used to be…including the Fourteenth Amendment’s “equal protection under the law.” That Amendment has already been overturned by the Obama Syndicate’s lawless totalitarian indulgences. Obama’s unions (who heavily contributed to his 2008 campaign) are now filing court cases to effectively shut down businesses that open new divisions in right to work states. The latest is Boeing. Due to these thug tactics, those businesses that have not already done so may now be forced to relocate to other countries. Under the Obama totalitarian collective no one except his favorites have any rights or liberties. And, if he doesn’t like you or your questions–as was the case with LTC Lakin–he’ll make sure you go to prison for daring to question him.
The supplementary tragedy is that, along with the rest of us, even those who voted for Obama will eventually be enslaved. But, I suppose they are already embracing their own forced servitude under the tyrant and the other ruling elites.
Texans Revolt Against TSA Tyranny, Storm Capitol:
at infowars.com
New Black Panther Case Spurs Civil Rights Commission to Challenge DOJ:
at cbsnews.com
Jailed For Questioning Barack Obama:
at personalliberty.com
Obama Certificate of Fraud Birth Master Records 2011 (FRAUD EXPOSED):
at youtube.com
Obama’s Birth Certificate Exposed as a Layered, Photoshopped, Fraud Hoax?:
at soulgardentv.ning.com
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news.
Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.
Sher can be reached at Sher_Zieve@yahoo.com.
Images added by Gulag Bound
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)
“Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”—William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)
Grandview, thanks but those quotations do not change the original meaning and intent of John Jay, George Washington, and the framers of the Constitution. Conveniently, you left out the references to the term, “natural born Citizen,” which were familiar to those designers (whose designs are changed only by amendment).
Also, if what you cite above were to be true of John Jay’s communication of that phrase, it would belie its use (as a prevention of an American Citizen who has jurisdiction and affinity for another nation by means of the nature of his birth, especially one born with British allegiance, as was BHO-II if BHO-I is actually his natural father).
Here is how the term Natural Born Citizen was used in 1803:
“Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. …St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)
As you can see, the meaning referred ONLY to the place of birth. And that is the way that John Jay, John Adams, James Madison and others used it at the time. They were all lawyers, and that was the meaning of Natural Born under the common law. The common law is referred to about twenty times in the Federalist Papers, while Vattel is not mentioned at all.
John Jay, a LAWYER and jurist, was talking about the common law when he wrote to George Washington. He was not referring to Vattel. If he had, he would have said.
Re Dual Nationality. The law in the US generally ignores foreign laws relating to citizenship. The idea that we should be jerked around by a foreign citizenship law is NOT a conservative principle. It would mean that a foreign country could just pass a law making Jeb Bush or anyone that it did not like a citizen of that country, and that would mean that Jeb would not be eligible. And besides, Thomas Jefferson actually was a dual national of the USA and France when he was president, having been made a full voting citizen with the right to run for office of France by the French National Assembly.
Grandview, if St. George Tucker’s comments may be isolated from its context and stand alone, they are simply wrong.
Minor v. Happerset instructs the federal courts correctly, per the true common law definition of “natural born Citizen.”
Great Britain maintained a liberal and aggressive view of who could be treated as a subject of the United Kingdom (the more there were, the more who might be taxed and even conscripted). That is a separate matter.
It appears to me that we are experiencing the early birthing pains of a dictatorship in America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrsBKGpwi58
Where did Barack Obama get his 57 states remark?
John L. Esposito, professor of religion and international affairs and director of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding (CMCU) at Georgetown University, is the leading defender of radical Islam in U.S. higher education — if not in the entire Western academy. He and his enterprise have returned to the public eye with the exposure that, in 2006-07, they were offered $325,000 by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to hold a conference on Islamophobia at the university.
A 57-member international body headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the OIC was founded in Morocco in 1969 to “protect” the Islamic sites in Jerusalem from Israel. It defines “Islamophobia” with considerable and questionable latitude, as any criticism of Muslim individual, institutional, ideological, legal, or cultural behavior. Combating Islamophobia as it conceives it, OIC seeks to prevent free discussion about Islam or the lives of Muslims under, for example, the radical Islamists dominating Saudi Arabia and ruling Iran.
Thank you, TS.
lneydhvmbhcpvoe, Acheter levitra, fSwkwiV, [url=http://dallascommercialrealestate.org/]Levitra professional[/url], bsUWKRg, http://dallascommercialrealestate.org/ Acheter levitra en france, XuaquSn.
xsfgwhvmbhcpvoe, Generic Viagra, IajBpQn, [url=http://www.southslopecondo.com/]Viagra[/url], sfMhEIF, http://www.southslopecondo.com/ Viagra, cJFpOgM.